Abstract:Validly characterizing youth mental health phenomena requires evidence-based approaches to assessment. An evidence-based assessment cannot rely on a "gold standard" instrument but rather, batteries of instruments. These batteries include multiple modalities of instrumentation (e.g., surveys, interviews, performance-based tasks, physiological readings, structured clinical observations). Among these instruments are those that require soliciting reports from multiple informants : People who provide psychometrically sound data about youth mental health (e.g., parents, teachers, youth themselves). The January 2011 issue of the Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology ( JCCAP ) included a Special Section devoted to the most common outcome of multi-informant assessments of youth mental health, namely discrepancies across informants' reports (i.e., informant discrepancies ). The 2011 JCCAP Special Section revolved around a critical question: Might informant discrepancies contain data relevant to understanding youth mental health (i.e., domain-relevant information )? This Special Issue is a "sequel" to the 2011 Special Section. Since 2011, an accumulating body of work indicates that informant discrepancies often contain domain-relevant information. Ultimately, we designed this Special Issue to lay the conceptual, methodological, and empirical foundations of guidelines for integrating multi-informant data when informant discrepancies contain domain-relevant information. In this introduction to the Special Issue, we briefly review the last 12 years of research and theory on informant discrepancies. This review highlights limitations inherent to the most commonly used strategies for integrating multi-informant data in youth mental health. We also describe contributions to the Special Issue, including articles about informant discrepancies that traverse multiple content areas (e.g., autism, implementation science, measurement validation, suicide).

Developments in the Reporting of Score Reliability within Counseling Assessment, Research, and Evaluation

Reliable for Whom? Inferring and Reporting Reliability across Diverse Populations

Treating Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficients as Data in Counseling Research

A Preliminary Investigation on the Counseling Outcome Assessment Model

Alpha, Omega, and H Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: Reviewing These Options and When to Use Them

Choosing Between Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, McDonald's Coefficient Omega, and Coefficient H: Confidence Intervals and the Advantages and Drawbacks of Interpretive Guidelines

Psychological Science Needs a Standard Practice of Reporting the Reliability of Cognitive-Behavioral Measurements

Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations

Reporting and Interpreting Scores Derived from Likert-type Scales

Score Reliability Generalization of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS): A Meta-Analysis

An administratively created reality: Some problems with the use of self-report questionnaire measures of adjustment in counselling/psychotherapy outcome research

Assessing Clinical Significance: Proposed Extensions to Method

Introduction to the Special Issue. A Dozen Years of Demonstrating That Informant Discrepancies are More Than Measurement Error: Toward Guidelines for Integrating Data from Multi-Informant Assessments of Youth Mental Health

Systematic Integration of Multi-Informant Externalizing Ratings in Clinical Settings

Consistency and source specificity of symptom ratings for Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory Scales with mother, father, and teacher ratings of Spanish children.

Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.

Reliability of work-related assessments

A note on the score reliability for the Satisfaction With Life Scale: an RG study

Reporting Practice in Multilevel Modeling: A Revisit After 10 Years

Attrition in developmental psychology

The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health.