Clinical Images: Kimura Disease of the Earlobe

Zhiyong Chen,Hua Zhang,Sheng-Ming Dai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11257
2021-01-01
ACR Open Rheumatology
Abstract:The patient, a 74-year-old woman, presented to our department with a 14-year history of recurrent enlarging mass on her left earlobe (A). She received an excision aproximately 13 years ago, when the mass was about 1×1 cm in size. However, the mass on the left earlobe recurred and enlarged gradually in the following several years. In addition, she developed an enlargement of left cervical lymph node during the past several months. A fine needle aspiration cytology of the cervical lymph node in another hospital showed eosinophil infiltration, and the staining for IgG4 was negative. On admission, laboratory assessment showed an eosinophil count of 3.4×109/L and a normal level of serum IgG4. Excision of the mass of earlobe was performed. The histopathological examination showed multiple lymphoid follicles and infiltration of lymphocytes and eosinophils (B), which was consistent with the diagnosis of Kimura disease (KD). She was treated with a short course of methylprednisolone, followed by local radiotherapy. The lymph node decreased significantly in size. She recovered well without specific complaints during the follow-up of 9 months. KD is a rare chronic inflammatory disease occurring predominantly in young men of Asian descent, and its prevalence remains unclear. KD typically presents with either single-focal or multifocal subcutaneous masses in the head and neck. Extracutaneous sites of involvement include the parotid, orbit, and nasal sinuses (1). KD should be differentiated from IgG4-related disease because the biopsy of some cases of KD showed coexistence of abundant eosinophils and IgG4-positive plasma cells (2). Other differential diagnoses include Mikulicz disease, sarcoidosis, lymphoma, and malignancy metastasis. A favorable outcome was obtained in most patients with the treatment of glucocorticoids, local radiotherapy, and surgery. Close follow-up should be made because of the possibility of recurrence, concomitant of lymphoma and renal involvement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?