Abstract:Background: For root coverage therapy, the connective tissue graft (CTG) plus coronally advanced flap (CAF) is considered the gold standard therapy against which alternative therapies are generally compared. When evaluating these therapies, in addition to traditional measures of root coverage, subject-reported, qualitative measures of esthetics, pain, and overall preferences for alternative procedures should also be considered. This study determines if a xenogeneic collagen matrix (CM) with CAF might be as effective as CTG+CAF in the treatment of recession defects. Methods: This study was a single-masked, randomized, controlled, split-mouth study of dehiscence-type recession defects in contralateral sites; one defect received CTG+CAF and the other defect received CM+CAF. A total of 25 subjects (8 male, 17 female; mean age: 43.7 +/- 12.2 years) were evaluated at 6 months and 1 year. The primary efficacy endpoint was recession depth at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included traditional periodontal measures, such as width of keratinized tissue and percentage of root coverage. Subject-reported values of pain, discomfort, and esthetic satisfaction were also recorded. Results: At 6 months, recession depth was on average 0.52 mm for test sites and 0.10 mm for control sites. Recession depth change from baseline was statistically significant between test and control, with an average of 2.62 mm gained at test sites and 3.10 mm gained at control sites for a difference of 0.4 mm (P = 0.0062). At 1 year, test percentage of root coverage averaged 88.5%, and controls averaged 99.3% (P = 0.0313). Keratinized tissue width gains were equivalent for both therapies and averaged 1.34 mm for test sites and 1.26 mm for control sites (P = 0.9061). There were no statistically significant differences between subject-reported values for esthetic satisfaction, and subjects' assessments of pain and discomfort were also equivalent. Conclusion: When balanced with subject-reported esthetic values and compared to historical root coverage outcomes reported by other investigators, CM+CAF presents a viable alternative to CTG+CAF, without the morbidity of soft tissue graft harvest.

Autologous Connective Tissue Graft Or Xenogenic Collagen Matrix With Coronally Advanced Flaps For Coverage Of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession. 36-Month Follow-Up Of A Randomized Multicentre Trial

Xenogenic collagen matrix or autologous connective tissue graft as adjunct to coronally advanced flaps for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recession: Randomized trial assessing non-inferiority in root coverage and superiority in oral health-related quality of life.

Efficacy of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aesthetic Assessment After Root Coverage Of Multiple Adjacent Recessions With Coronally Advanced Flap With Adjunctive Collagen Matrix Or Connective Tissue Graft: Randomized Clinical Trial

Running Title : Multiple gingival recession treatment

Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects

Clinical efficacy of acellular dermal matrix for plastic periodontal and implant surgery: a systematic review

Long‐term Stability of Root Coverage Procedures for Single Gingival Recessions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession with loss of inter-dental attachment. A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Collagen Matrix Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue for Recession Coverage: A Systematic Review

Clinical Efficacy Of Coronally Advanced Flap With Or Without Connective Tissue Graft For The Treatment Of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions In The Aesthetic Area: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Does placement of a connective tissue graft improve the outcomes of coronally advanced flap for coverage of single gingival recessions in upper anterior teeth? A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.

Coronally Advanced Flap And Composite Restoration Of The Enamel With Or Without Connective Tissue Graft For The Treatment Of Single Maxillary Gingival Recession With Non-Carious Cervical Lesion. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Xenogeneic collagen matrix vs. connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recession: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stability of root coverage outcomes at single maxillary gingival recession with loss of interdental attachment: 3-year extension results from a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

Predictor factors for long-term outcomes stability of coronally advanced flap with or without connective tissue graft in the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: 9 years results of a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Bioresorbable Xenogeneic Peritoneal Membrane vs Connective Tissue Graft in the Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions with Concentrated Growth Factor Membrane and Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique Via Digital Measurements: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Tunnel technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft, with or without cross‐linked hyaluronic acid, in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: 12‐month outcomes of a randomized clinical trial

A multi‐centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the buccal aspect of single implants: 3‐Year results

Long-term Comparison of Root Coverage Procedures at Single RT2 Maxillary Gingival Recessions: Ten-year Extension Results from a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.