Emergence of Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam in a <i>Pseudomonas</i> <i>aeruginosa</i> Isolate Producing Derepressed <i>bla</i><sub>PDC</sub> in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model

G. L. Drusano,Robert A. Bonomo,Steven M. Marshall,Laura J. Rojas,Mark D. Adams,Maria F. Mojica,Barry N. Kreiswirth,Liang Chen,Nino Mtchedlidze,Meredith Bacci,Michael Vicchiarelli,Jurgen B. Bulitta,Arnold Louie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00124-21
IF: 5.938
2021-01-01
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Abstract:Ceftazidime (CAZ)-avibactam (AVI) is a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against type A and type C beta-lactamases. Resistance emergence has been seen, with multiple mechanisms accounting for the resistance. We performed four experiments in the dynamic hollow-fiber infection model, delineating the linkage between drug exposure and both the rate of bacterial kill and resistance emergence by all mechanisms. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate had MICs of 1.0mg/liter (CAZ) and 4mg/liter (AVI). We demonstrated that the time at >= 4.0 mg/liter AVI was linked to the rate of bacterial kill. Linkage to resistance emergence/suppression was more complex. In one experiment in which CAZ and AVI administration was intermittent and continuous, respectively, and in which AVI was given in unitary steps from 1 to 8mg/liter, AVI at up to 3mg/liter allowed resistance emergence, whereas higher values did not. The threshold value was 3.72mg/liter as a continuous infusion to counterselect resistance (AVI area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] of 89.3mg . h/liter). The mechanism involved a 7-amino-acid deletion in the X-loop region of the Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC) beta-lactamase. Further experiments in which CAZ and AVI were both administered intermittently with regimens above and below the AUC of 89.3mg . h/liter resulted in resistance in the lower-exposure groups. Deletion mutants were not identified. Finally, in an experiment in which paired exposures as both continuous and intermittent infusions were performed, the lower value of 25mg . h/liter by both profiles allowed selection of deletion mutants. Of the five instances in which these mutants were recovered, four had a continuous-infusion profile. Both continuous-infusion administration and low AVI AUC exposures have a role in selection of this mutation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?