Optimal time point of response assessment for predicting survival is associated with tumor burden in hepatocellular carcinoma receiving repeated transarterial chemoembolization
Dongdong Xia,Qiuhe Wang,Wei Bai,Enxin Wang,Zhexuan Wang,Wei Mu,Junhui Sun,Ming Huang,Guowen Yin,Hailiang Li,Hui Zhao,Chunqing Zhang,Jing Li,Jianbing Wu,Xiaoli Zhu,Shufa Yang,Xingnan Pan,Jiaping Li,Zixiang Li,Guohui Xu,Haibin Shi,Hui Zhang,Yuelin Zhang,Rong Ding,Hui Yu,Lin Zheng,Xiaohu Yang,Guangchuan Wang,Nan You,Long Feng,Shuai Zhang,Wukui Huang,Tao Xu,Wenzhe Fan,Xueda Li,Xuegang Yang,Weizhong Zhou,Wenjun Wang,Xiaomei Li,Zhengyu Wang,Bohan Luo,Jing Niu,Jie Yuan,Yong Lv,Kai Li,Wengang Guo,Zhanxin Yin,Daiming Fan,Jielai Xia,Guohong Han,,Dongdong Xia,Qiuhe Wang,Wei Bai,Enxin Wang,Zhexuan Wang,Wei Mu,Junhui Sun,Ming Huang,Guowen Yin,Hailiang Li,Hui Zhao,Chunqing Zhang,Jing Li,Jianbing Wu,Xiaoli Zhu,Shufa Yang,Xingnan Pan,Jiaping Li,Zixiang Li,Guohui Xu,Haibin Shi,Hui Zhang,Yuelin Zhang,Rong Ding,Hui Yu,Lin Zheng,Xiaohu Yang,Guangchuan Wang,Nan You,Long Feng,Shuai Zhang,Wukui Huang,Tao Xu,Wenzhe Fan,Xueda Li,Xuegang Yang,Weizhong Zhou,Wenjun Wang,Xiaomei Li,Zhengyu Wang,Bohan Luo,Jing Niu,Jie Yuan,Yong Lv,Kai Li,Wengang Guo,Zhanxin Yin,Daiming Fan,Jielai Xia,Guohong Han,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08716-4
IF: 7.034
2022-04-06
European Radiology
Abstract:ObjectivesObjective response rate (ORR) under mRECIST criteria after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a well-perceived surrogate endpoint of overall survival (OS). However, its optimal time point remains controversial and may be influenced by tumor burden. We aim to investigate the surrogacy of initial/best ORR in relation to tumor burden.MethodsA total of 1549 eligible treatment-naïve patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Child-Pugh score ≤ 7, and performance status score ≤ 1 undergoing TACE between January 2010 and May 2016 from 17 academic hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Based on "six-and-twelve" criteria, tumor burden was graded as low, intermediate, and high if the sum of the maximum tumor diameter and tumor number was ≤ 6, > 6 but ≤ 12, and > 12, respectively.ResultsBoth initial and best ORRs interacted with tumor burden. Initial and best ORRs could equivalently predict and correlate with OS in low (adjusted HR, 2.55 and 2.95, respectively, both p < 0.001; R = 0.84, p = 0.035, and R = 0.97, p = 0.002, respectively) and intermediate strata (adjusted HR, 1.81 and 2.22, respectively, both p < 0.001; R = 0.74, p = 0.023, and R = 0.9, p = 0.002, respectively). For high strata, only best ORR exhibited qualified surrogacy (adjusted HR, 2.61, p < 0.001; R = 0.70, p = 0.035), whereas initial ORR was not significant (adjusted HR, 1.08, p = 0.357; R = 0.22, p = 0.54).ConclusionsORR as surrogacy of OS is associated with tumor burden. For patients with low/intermediate tumor burden, initial ORR should be preferred in its early availability upon similar sensitivity, whereas for patients with high tumor burden, best ORR has optimal sensitivity. Timing of OR assessment should be tailored according to tumor burden.Key Points• This is the first study utilizing individual patient data to comprehensively analyze the surrogacy of ORR with a long follow-up period.• Optimal timing of ORR assessment for predicting survival should be tailored according to tumor burden.• For patients with low and intermediate tumor burden, initial ORR is optimal for its timeliness upon similar sensitivity with best ORR. For patients with high tumor burden, best ORR has optimal sensitivity.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging