Change in the Earth–Moon Impactor Population at about 3.5 Billion Years Ago

Minggang Xie,Zhiyong Xiao,Luyuan Xu,Wenzhe Fa,Aoao Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01241-8
IF: 14.1
2020-01-01
Nature Astronomy
Abstract:The bombardment of impactors (leftover planetesimals, asteroids and comets) created numerous impact craters on the Moon. The giant planets in the outer Solar System are believed to have experienced a dynamical instability, in which the migration of giant planets delivers impactors to the inner Solar System bodies 1 , 2 . The difference between the population of large (diameter more than 5 km) impact craters observed on heavily cratered lunar highlands and that on the lunar maria 3 was thought to support the lunar Late Heavy Bombardment, which started 0.6 billion years after planet formation and could have been caused by the late instability of giant planets 4 – 6 . However, large craters on various-aged lunar surfaces have similar size–frequency distributions when considering the preferential erasure of small craters 7 , 8 . In addition, dynamical and geochemical evidence favour an early instability of giant planets at 4.5 Gyr ago 2 , 5 , 9 . Here, we report the evolution at geological scales of regolith thickness on the Moon, which is a proxy for the change of the size–frequency distribution slope for Earth–Moon impactors with diameters less than 50 m (which generate craters with diameters less than 1 km (ref. 10 )). We found an abnormally slow growth of regolith thickness per unit of impact flux before 3.5_ - 0.6^ + 0.3 Gyr ago (3 σ uncertainty), which can best be explained by a population of craters of less than 1 km whose size–frequency distribution had a shallower power-law slope ( - 2.57_ - 0.16^ + 0.30 ) than that afterward ( - 3.24_ - 0.06^ + 0.03 ). The transition time at 3.5 Gyr ago supports the early instability of giant planets, in which dominant Earth–Moon impactors changed from leftover planetesimals to asteroids 5 . The value of −3.24 is consistent with the preferential delivery of small asteroids via Yarkovsky–YORP effects 11 .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?