Abstract:Why do entrepreneurs prefer to seek one equity form of funding over another? To address this question, we develop a contingency-based model of perceived funding fit that delineates several factors that influence strategic fund-seeking decisions by entrepreneurs. In prior research, entrepreneur fund-seeking has largely been explained using models that rely on rule-based approaches (e.g., the pecking order assumption) or value capture considerations. In contrast, we propose a dynamic contingency-based model that delineates several factors that influence entrepreneur perceptions of funding fit over and above transactional efficiency, including atypical value creation from the fundraising process itself and external stakeholder values. We inductively assess our model in the context of equity crowdfunding (ECF) and find that perceived funding fit can motivate some strategic fund-seekers to opt to pursue ECF, even when they have a reasonable opportunity to obtain other more established sources of funding such as angel or seed-stage venture capital. This indicates that ECF in several cases is not a funding mode of last resort as proposed in prior literature. Plain English Summary Raising capital is a complex and dynamic process. Strategic entrepreneurs seek "funding fit" for their particular ventures leading some to opt for less established forms of funding such as equity crowdfunding for a variety of reasons beyond efficiency. Prior venture funding research has largely taken the view of the investor, emphasizing what entrepreneurs must do to win the favor of angel investors and other seed funders, and deeming equity crowdfunding (ECF) a funding mode of last resort for discouraged entrepreneurs. Inductively analyzing hundreds of regulatory filings, entrepreneur interviews, public information, and media pieces about ECF-funded firms, we find evidence that in several cases, strategic entrepreneurs may prefer to opt for ECF if they perceive it to be a better fit due to novel forms of nonfinancial value. We explain our findings by proposing an emergent contingency-based model of "funding fit."

The Economics of Hedge Fund Startups: Theory and Empirical Evidence

The start matters: time-varying investor demand, hedge fund inceptions, and performance

When the Start Matters: Investor Sentiment and Hedge Fund Inceptions

The Dynamics of Hedge Fund Share Restrictions

Funding Risk, Patient Capital, and the Dynamics of Hedge Fund Lockups

Are Hedge Fund Capacity Constraints Binding? Evidence on Scale and Competition*

Does Hedge Fund Performance Persist? Overview and New Empirical Evidence

Alumni social networks and hedge fund performance: Evidence from China

Innovation, asymmetric information and the capital structure of new firms

Empirical Analysis on Hedge Fund Performance

Why do experienced hedge fund managers have lower returns

What is the Nature of Hedge Fund Manager Skills? Evidence from the Risk-Arbitrage Strategy

Hedge Fund Alpha: Cycle or Sunset?

Hedge Funds Trading Strategies and Leverage

An Analysis of Compensation in the Hedge Fund Industry

Thriving in a Disrupted Market: a Study of Chinese Hedge Fund Performance

Hedge Fund Performance Evaluation under the Stochastic Discount Factor Framework

Hedge Funds and Stock Price Formation

Death and the life hereafter: A study of the subsequent hedge funds

Entrepreneur fund-seeking: toward a theory of funding fit in the era of equity crowdfunding

A General Equilibrium Study of Venture Capitalists' Effort on Entrepreneurship