Abstract:Abstract Loss-averse decisions, in which one avoids losses at the expense of gains, are highly prevalent. However, the underlying mechanisms remain controversial. The prevailing account highlights a valuation bias that overweighs losses relative to gains, but an alternative view stresses a response bias to avoid choices involving potential losses. Here we couple a computational process model with eye-tracking and pupillometry to develop a physiologicallygrounded framework for the decision process leading to accepting or rejecting gambles with equal odds of winning and losing money. Overall, loss-averse decisions were accompanied by preferential gaze towards losses and increased pupil dilation for accepting gambles. Using our model, we found gaze allocation selectively indexed valuation bias, and pupil dilation selectively indexed response bias. Finally, we demonstrated that our computational model and physiological biomarkers can identify distinct types of loss-averse decision-makers who would otherwise be indistinguishable using conventional approaches. Our study provides an integrative framework for the cognitive processes that drive loss-averse decisions and highlights the biological heterogeneity of loss aversion across individuals. Significance Statement We revisit the concept of loss aversion by synthesizing distinct views into an integrative framework and by probing physiological biomarkers associated with the behavior. The framework decomposes loss aversion into a valuation bias, which weighs losses over gains, and a response bias, which avoids loss-related choices altogether. Further, we revealed a double dissociation in physiology underlying the decision process. Valuation bias was associated with preferential gaze allocation to losses whereas response bias was associated with pupillary dilation. Our framework exposed biological heterogeneity underlying loss aversion and distinguishes different loss-averse decision makers who are otherwise indistinguishable using conventional approaches. Our integrative approach provides a deeper analysis of the mechanisms underlying loss aversion and incorporates distinct views within a unified biological framework.

Gambling Versus Investment: Lay Theory and Loss Aversion

Myopic Loss Aversion or Equate-to-differentiate Heuristic? A Heuristic Decision Making Model for Both Single and Aggregated Plays.

Riskier for Me or for Others? the Role of Domain and Probability in Self-Other Differences, in Risky Decision-Making

Looming Large or Seeming Small? Attitudes Towards Losses in a Representative Sample

The Ending Effect in the Domain of Gambling: The Effect of Gain-Loss Status on Economic Decision-Making

Decomposing Loss Aversion from Gaze Allocation and Pupil Dilation

When Do Investors Gamble in the Stock Market?

Loss Aversion in Behavioral Decision Making:Influential Factors and Behavioral Manifestation

Investment Decision under Constraint of Loss Aversion

The Neural Dynamics of Loss Aversion

Are decisions under risk malleable?

Gambling disorder is associated with reduced sensitivity to expected value during risky choice

Research on Loss Aversion and Its Formation in Prospect Theory

Gambling habits and Probability Judgements in a Bayesian Task Environment

Predicting the Behavioural Tendency of Loss Aversion

The Gambling Preference and Stock Price: Evidence from China's Stock Market

Decomposing loss aversion from a single neural signal

Financial Loss Aversion Illusion*

Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices

Culture and gambling fallacies

Unpleasant odors increase aversion to monetary losses