Abstract:Unsupervised adversarial domain adaptation (ADA) aims to learn domain-invariant features by confusing a domain discriminator. As training goes on, the feature distributions of source and target samples are increasingly aligned/indistinguishable. The discrimination capability of the domain discriminator w.r.t. those aligned samples deteriorates due to the domain label of each sample is still fixed all through the learning process, which thus cannot effectively further drive the feature learning. A recently proposed method named Re-enforceable Adversarial Domain Adaptation (RADA) [1] tend to re-energize the domain discriminator during the training by using dynamic domain labels. Specifically, RADA sets up a heuristic criterion and uses it to relabel the well aligned target domain samples as source domain samples on the fly. In our study, we identify a critical problem of RADA: it is a kind of heuristic domain data re-partition solution without explicitly serving the adaptation task itself, suggesting that the criteria of RADA on which sample should be relabeled is hard to decide. To address the problem, we revisit domain relabeling process from a perspective of prompt tuning, and introduce a meta-optimized learnable prompts into RADA to replace some hand-craft designs in dynamic relabeling process, which scheme is named as RADA-prompt. Particularly, we employ a module of meta-prompter, which learns to adaptively relabel the samples based on the objective of serving UDA task. To train the meta-prompter, we leverage a domain alignment measurement and a classification measurement as the meta optimization objective. Extensive experiments on multiple unsupervised domain adaptation benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of RADA-prompt, this scheme also achieves state-of-the-art performance.

Re-energizing Domain Discriminator with Sample Relabeling for Adversarial Domain Adaptation.

Federated Domain Adaptation via Pseudo-label Refinement

Domain Prompt Tuning Via Meta Relabeling for Unsupervised Adversarial Adaptation

Selective Transfer with Reinforced Transfer Network for Partial Domain Adaptation.

Label Disentangled Analysis for unsupervised visual domain adaptation

Adversarial-Learned Loss for Domain Adaptation

Reliable Domain Adaptation With Classifiers Competition

Reusing the Task-specific Classifier as a Discriminator: Discriminator-free Adversarial Domain Adaptation

Re-weighted Adversarial Adaptation Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

Reliable Domain Adaptation With Classifiers Competition For Image Classification

Class Discriminative Adversarial Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

Dynamic bias alignment and discrimination enhancement for unsupervised domain adaptation

Reducing Bias to Source Samples for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

Domain-Augmented Domain Adaptation

Self-adaptive Re-weighted Adversarial Domain Adaptation

Adversarial Domain Adaptation with Domain Mixup

Unsupervised domain adaptation with weak source domain labels via bidirectional subdomain alignment

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Joint Domain-Adversarial Reconstruction Networks

Domain Adaptation without Model Transferring

RDA: Robust Domain Adaptation via Fourier Adversarial Attacking

Source-free Domain Adaptation Via Dynamic Pseudo Labeling and Self-supervision