Abstract:Abstract Background Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis(IPAA)is the procedure of choice in patients requiring total proctocolectomy.The reported leak rates after IPAA surgery range from 1-12% with well described significant impact on postoperative morbidity and recovery.However, the long-term impact of salvaged pouch leaks on the broader quality of life outcome and pouch function remains poorly understood.The aim of this study was to compare between patients with and without postoperative leaks after IPAA surgery, hypothesizing that patients with salvaged pouch leaks would have worse long-term quality of life and pouch function compared to matched patients without leaks. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent IPAA(n=4058) between 1995-2022.Leak was defined as abscess or fistula requiring intervention, who had definitive resolution of their pouch leaks, whether with conservative treatment or after salvage surgery or pouch excision with end ileostomy creation. The Leak group consisted of 194 patients with treated leaks.The No Leak group included 963 patients without leaks,matched 1:5 on sex, age(± 3 years),and surgery date.Questionnaire data were available for 85 of 194 patients with leaks and 614 of 963 without leaks. Quality of life(QoL) was assessed using SF-36, health status using EORTC QLQ-C30(QoH),and life enjoyment(QoE) using a standardized scale.Bowel movements,seepage,and pad usage were recorded.Outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney U,t-tests, and chi-square tests. Results A total of 699 patients with IPAA were included, with 85(12%)in the leak group. The median age was 42 (IQR, 31-53) years, and 54% were male. Median time from surgery to the last QoL assessment was 6.58(IQR: 3.5-11.3) years in the Leak group and 6.05 (IQR: 2.5-11.2) days in the No Leak group. Patients with Leaks reported significantly lower QoL (median 7(IQR:5-9)vs8 (IQR:7-9);p<0.001), lower health status on the QoH scale (median 7(IQR: 5-8) vs 8 (IQR :7-9); p<0.001), and lower life enjoyment on the QoE scale (median 7(IQR: 5-8)vs7(IQR :6-9);p=0.003) compared to the No Leak group. A higher proportion of patients in the Leak group reported daytime (49%vs.20%,p<0.001) and nocturnal seepage (66%vs.38%, p=0.001), along with greater daytime(40%vs.22%,p=0.01) and nighttime pad usage (53%vs.30%,p=0.001). There were no significant differences in the number of bowel movements per 24h (p=0.54), daytime bowel movements(p=0.7), or nighttime bowel movements (p=0.695) between the groups. Conclusion In matched cohorts,salvaged pouch leaks were associated with reduced quality of life,health status,and life enjoyment compared with matched patients without leaks.Patients with leaks also had increased rates of seepage and pad usage,indicating worse pouch function.

A retrospective cohort study on renal morbidity related to stoma type in inflammatory bowel disease patients following colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery

Interventions to reduce dehydration related to defunctioning loop ileostomy after low anterior resection in rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study

Postoperative Morbidity Following Loop Ileostomy Reversal after Primary Elective or Urgent Surgery: A Retrospective Study with 145 Patients

Impact of diverting ileostomy on functional outcome and quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis

What is the rate of definitive stoma after subtotal colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease? A nationwide study of 1860 patients

Causes and costs of delayed closure of ileostomies in rectal cancer patients in Australasian units

Risk Factors for Small Bowel Obstruction After Laparoscopic Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multivariate Analysis in Four Expert Centres in Europe

P214 Effects of rectal stump proctitis on short-term postoperative complications after proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis

P521 Impact of pouch leaks on quality of life and symptoms in patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery

Perioperative outcomes of ileorectal anastomosis – an analysis of 823 patients

Routine diversion following delayed IPAA construction does not reduce the incidence of pouch‐related sepsis or failure in patients with ulcerative colitis

Impact of ileostomy on postoperative wound complications in patients after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

Outcome of incidental versus preoperatively diagnosed colorectal cancer during total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease

[Prognostic factors of dehydration and renal damage in patients with formed preventive ileostomy during rectal resection for cancer]

Is a Defunctioning Stoma Necessary After Left Colectomy in High-risk Patients for Anastomotic Leak?

Diverting ileostomy in low anterior resection: single center retrospective analysis

Diverting Stoma Prevents Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage but Not Intra-abdominal Infection After Low Anterior Resection

DOP51 Risk of kidney failure in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease undergoing colectomy: a nationwide cohort study

Analysis of risk factors for the sigmoid stoma complications in patients after abdominoperineal resection surgery: An observational study

Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients

Infectious Complications After Modified Purse-String Stoma Closure