Abstract:Background: Increasing life spans of populations and a growing demand for more advanced care make effective and cost-efficient provision of health care necessary. eHealth technology is often proposed, although research on barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of eHealth technology is still scarce and fragmented. Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the perceptions concerning barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of eHealth among policy makers and service users and explore the ways in which their perceptions converge and differ. Methods: This study used interview data from policy makers at different levels of health care (n=7) and service users enrolled in eHealth interventions (n=25). The analysis included separate qualitative content analyses for the 2 groups and then a second qualitative content analysis to explore differences and commonalities. Results: Implementation barriers perceived by policy makers were that not all service users benefit from eHealth and that there is uncertainty about the impact of eHealth on the work of health care professionals. Policy makers also perceived political decision-making as complex; this included problems related to provision of technical infrastructure and lack of extra resources for health care digitalization. Facilitators were policy makers' conviction that eHealth is what citizens want, their belief in eHealth solutions as beneficial for health care practice, and their belief in the importance of health care digitalization. Barriers for service users comprised capability limitations and varied preferences of service users and a mismatch of technology with user needs, lack of data protection, and their perception of eHealth as being more time consuming. Facilitators for service users were eHealth technology design and match with their skill set, personal feedback and staff support, a sense of privacy, a credible sender, and flexible use of time.There were several commonalities between the 2 stakeholder groups. Facilitators for both groups were the strong impetus toward technology adoption in society and expectations of time flexibility. Both groups perceived barriers in the difficulties of tailoring eHealth, and both groups expressed uncertainty about the care burden distribution. There were also differences: policy makers perceived that their decision-making was very complex and that resources for implementation were limited. Service users highlighted their need to feel that their digital data were protected and that they needed to trust the eHealth sender. Conclusions: Perceptions about barriers to and facilitators of eHealth implementation varied among stakeholders in different parts of the health care system. The study points to the need to reach an enhanced mutual understanding of priorities and overcome challenges at both the micro and macro levels of the health care system. More well-balanced decisions at the policy-maker level may lead to more effective and sustainable development and future implementation of eHealth.

Policy Rationales for Electronic Information Systems: An Area of Ambiguity

Electronic Information Systems: In search of responsive social work

Electronic Information Systems in Human Service Organisations: The What, Who, Why and How of Information

Designing electronic information systems for the future: Social workers and the challenge of New Public Management

Implementing Electronic Information Systems in Human Service Organisations: The Challenge of Categorisation

Making sense of complex electronic records: socio-technical design in social care

Examination and diagnosis of electronic patient records and their associated ethics: a scoping literature review

Barriers and facilitators to electronic documentation in a rural hospital

Technology Configuring the User: Implications for the Redesign of Electronic Information Systems in Social Work

Researching Local Government Using Electronic Surveys

Promoting the digital future: the construction of digital automation in Swedish policy discourse on social assistance

Ethical considerations in an online community: the balancing act

Precarious Experiences: Citizens' Frustrations, Anxieties and Burdens of an Online Welfare Benefit System

Digitization or equality: When government automation covers some, but not all citizens

E-Government Tools, Claimed Potentials/Unnamed Limitations

Robodebt: A Socio-Technical Case Study of Public Sector Information Systems Failure

Attitudes toward inter-hospital electronic patient record exchange: discrepancies among physicians, medical record staff, and patients

Ambivalence in digital social work: giving advice about welfare-to-work programmes to unemployed clients

Perspectives of Policy Makers and Service Users Concerning the Implementation of eHealth in Sweden: Interview Study

How IT allows E-Participation in Policy-Making Process

Persistent inequitable design and implementation of patient portals for users at the margins