Abstract:Successful prospective remembering involves formation of a stimulus (e.g., bottle of medication and/or place where the bottle is kept)–response (e.g., taking a medication) link. We investigated the role of this link in the deactivation of no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions, as evidenced by commission error risk. Experiment <a href="/article/10.3758/s13421-020-01091-9#Sec2">1a</a> contrasted two hypotheses of intention deactivation (<i>degree of fulfillment</i> and <i>response frequency</i>) by holding constant the degree of intention fulfillment (e.g., participants responded to one of two target words) while manipulating the number of times the intention was performed. Findings supported the response frequency hypothesis. Experiment <a href="/article/10.3758/s13421-020-01091-9#Sec6">1b</a> employed novel lure trials to examine what "stimulus" participants link the prospective memory response to—target words and/or the salient contextual cue—and compared commission errors to Experiment <a href="/article/10.3758/s13421-020-01091-9#Sec2">1a</a>. Findings suggested the salient context alone does not always function as the stimulus. Collectively these findings, in conjunction with those of Experiment <a href="/article/10.3758/s13421-020-01091-9#Sec10">2</a> (a within-experiment replication) and a combined analysis, suggest that (a) intention deactivation is facilitated by prior responding (formation/strengthening of stimulus–response links), but additional research is needed to establish the robustness of this effect, and (b) when responding frequently to targets, participants are more likely to bind the response to the context alone than to the target or target/context combination, possibly because they learn to rely on context to predict target occurrence. The latter finding was robust and indicates that deactivation of the appropriate stimulus (target and/or context)–response link may be a critical component of reducing commission errors.

Mechanisms of Commission Errors in Aftereffects of Completed Intentions

Intention deactivation: effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions

Aftereffects and deactivation of completed prospective memory intentions: A systematic review.

Failing to forget: Prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control.

Commission errors in delay–execute prospective memory tasks

The Effect of Implementation Intentions on Prospective Memory Commission Errors under Different Cognitive Loads

Commission errors with forced response lag

The Rehearsal Effect Of Object-Based Attention On Object Working Memory

The role of temporal delay and repeated prospective memory cue exposure on the deactivation of completed intentions

Whoops, I did it again: Commission errors in prospective memory.

Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach

Forming a new prospective memory intention can reduce prospective memory commission errors

Commission errors of active intentions: the roles of aging, cognitive load, and practice

Structural correlates of commission errors in prospective memory

The role of cue salience in prospective memory commission errors in nonperformed nonfocal tasks

Deactivation of prospective memory intentions: Examining the role of the stimulus–response link

Involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in time-based prospective memory task monitoring: An EEG analysis of brain sources using Independent Component and Measure Projection Analysis

When we must forget: the effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors

Interference Effect from Prospective Memory:Evidence for Multiprocess

Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors

The effect of emotional target and context on the aftereffects of prospective memory