Abstract:Previous reviews evaluating CBM‐I in youth have found a small effect on anxiety outcomes, but little is known about the effect on anxiety and depression outcomes using validated symptom measures only, which would provide a better indicator of CBM‐I's clinical relevance. This meta‐analysis found CBM‐I had a small and non‐significant unadjusted effect on anxiety and depressive symptoms using validated measures, as well as state negative affect at post‐training and following a stressor. CBM‐I had moderate to large unadjusted effects on negative and positive interpretations. There were no significant moderators. Background Evidence suggests that cognitive bias modification of interpretations (CBM‐I) is effective in modifying interpretation biases and has a small effect on reducing anxiety in children and adolescents. However, most evidence to date is based on studies which report anxiety or general distress using ad‐hoc Likert‐type or Visual Analogue Scales, which are useful but do not reliably index symptoms of clinical importance. This meta‐analysis aimed to establish the effects of CBM‐I for children and adolescents on both anxiety and depression using psychometrically validated symptom measures, as well as state negative affect and negative and positive interpretation bias. Methods We identified studies through a systematic search. To be eligible for inclusion, studies needed to target interpretation biases, not combine CBM‐I with another intervention, randomly allocate participants to CBM‐I or a control condition, assess a mental health outcome (i.e., anxiety or depression symptoms using validated measures or state measures of negative affect) and/or interpretation bias and have a mean age less than 18 years. Results We identified 36 studies for inclusion in the meta‐analysis. CBM‐I had a small and non‐significant unadjusted effect on anxiety symptoms (g = 0.16), no effect on depression symptoms (g = −0.03), and small and non‐significant unadjusted effects on state negative affect both at post‐training (g = 0.16) and following a stressor task (g = 0.23). In line with previous findings, CBM‐I had moderate to large unadjusted effects on negative and positive interpretations (g = 0.78 and g = 0.52). No significant moderators were identified. Conclusions CBM‐I is effective at modifying interpretation bias, however there were no effects on mental health outcomes. The substantial variability across studies and paucity of studies using validated symptom measures highlight the need to establish randomized controlled trial protocols that evaluate CBM‐I in clinical youth samples to determine its future as a clinical intervention.

Cognitive Bias Modification for Anxiety Disorders：Application and Conflict

Enhancing the Efficacy of Cognitive Bias Modification for Social Anxiety

Pharmacotherapy and cognitive bias modification for the treatment of anxiety disorders

Multisession Cognitive Bias Modification Targeting Multiple Biases in Adolescents with Elevated Social Anxiety

The Application of Exceptions Questions in the Cognitive Bias Modification for Chinese College Students with Non-Clinical Social Anxiety

Attentional Bias Training Towards Social Anxiety

Social anxiety and attentional bias to negative emotional information: the relationship and intervention

Cognitive bias modification of interpretations for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: A meta‐analysis

Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition

Attentional Training for Social Anxiety in College Students

Does attention bias modification reduce anxiety in socially anxious college students? An experimental study of potential moderators and considerations for implementation

Application of Cognitive Bias Testing in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Mini-Review Based on Animal Studies

The impact of attention bias modification training on behavioral and physiological responses

Internet-Based Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Training towards Negative and Training Towards Positive Cues

Negative and positive attention bias in anhedonia and anxious arousal: Can depression and anxiety be distinguished by patterns of engagement and disengagement bias?

Negatively biased cognition as a mechanism of mindfulness: a review of the literature

Caveolin-3 expression and caveolae are required for isoflurane-induced cardiac protection from hypoxia and ischemia/reperfusion injury.

The effect of attention bias modification on the recognition of dynamic-angry faces in individuals with high social anxiety: Evidence from event-related brain potentials

Effect of affect on social cost bias in social anxiety disorder

The Effects of Positive Training on Anxiety and Cognitive Bias for Socially Anxious Individuals

How State Anxiety and Attentional Bias Interact with Each Other: the Moderating Effect of Cognitive Appraisal.