Abstract:The Grand Strategy of the United States, including its strategy toward China, has always been the product of the interaction of geopolitics and domestic politics. After the Cold War, with the end of the bipolar structure of the international system and the increasing polarization of domestic politics in the United States, the impact of geopolitics on the formulation of the foreign policy of the United States has been weakened to some degree, while the spillover effect of domestic politics has weighed more heavily than before. This change could be explained in the way that while two opposing trends of Partisan Realignment began to emerge in the post-financial crisis era in the United States, the elites from both Democratic and Republican Parties had often focused on the preferences of their core political coalition as basis in foreign policy making, in order to further their own respective political interests. In regard to the American strategy toward China, with the deepening of the structural contradictions between China and the United States as well as changes in their respective external strategic choices, geopolitics became the primary logic in the formulation of American strategy toward China since 2009, thus the “strategic competition” has become the dominant mode of bilateral relations. In the view of Washington, China and the United States have formed a competitive relationship in the areas relating to the core interests of the United States, such as economy, security, values and the dominance of the existing international order. However, the questions of reality, such as how to compete with China and how to decide the priorities of their own core interests, are defined by demands of core political coalitions represented by the elites from both Democratic and Republican Parties in the context of a new round of Partisan Realignment. From Obama to Trump, different domestic political logics made the focus of American strategy toward China shifted from “institution–values” competition based on globalism to “economy–security” competition based on nationalism. Therefore, the changes in American domestic politics will present an important channel through which the orientation of American strategy toward China would be clearly observed in the future.

American Politics in the Trump Era: Continuation, Change and Trend

Online Political Discourse in the Trump Era

The U.S.Political Realignment and the Preconditions

“Trump and racial equality in America? No pretense at all!”

Teaching political behavior in the age of Trump

Is Trump Always Rambling Like a Fourth-Grade Student? an Analysis of Stylistic Features of Donald Trump’s Political Discourse During the 2016 Election

U.S. Foreign Policy on the Verge of a New Path

The United States: Political Developments and Data in 2023

The United States: Political Developments and Data in 2022

The United States: Political Developments and Data in 2021

President Trump, Trade Policy, and American Grand Strategy: From Common Advantage to Collective Carnage

On the Decline and Revival of American Political History

The Rise of Donald Trump Right-Wing Populism in the United States: Middle American Radicalism and Anti-Immigration Discourse

Defining China–US Strategic Competition: Partisan Realignment and the Domestic Political Logic of Change in American Strategy Toward China, 2009–2020

The Logic of American Politics:A Research Agenda

The President Is in: Public Opinion and the Presidential Use of Twitter

Business First: Trump’s Economic Measures as Offensive Weaponry

Near, Far: the Beginning of a Twenty-First Century Progressive Era in the US?

Politics v. science: How President Trump's war on science impacted public health and environmental regulation

A Journey between Four Models: American Politics (1978-2008)

Political Polarization:A Great Challenge Facing the US Today