One Legal Concept of the Lowest Limit

Wang Ren-b

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8003.2003.01.002

2003-01-01

Abstract:In recent years many theories of the rule of have been adapted from the West to China. In general, there are two methodologies in the western academic theories: one is “fundamentalism”, the other is “ecumenicalism”. The former carries forward the western classical tradition and claims that construction of a reasonable legal order is rational as well as possible by providing certain essential values and moral demands for “law”. Whereas the latter, which tries to sidestep those basic values and moral demands, explores the knowledge and execution of the rule of only in the spectrum of “the legal order”. The rule of can be testified of different culture's own accord and, furthermore the common understanding of the rule of can be achieved through respective practice and mutual dialogue among the different cultures. The Chinese Legalists' “conception of the rule of law merges into the ecumenical ones to a certain extend, and this article will attempt to inspect the feasibility of Chinese adapting ecumenical conception of the rule of by comparing positive legal thought and Legalists'