On Grassman's Interpretations of the Structure and Method in Marx's Capital: Considerations on the Political Economy Approaches by Early Frankfurt School

Jiaxin Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.2019.04.005
2019-01-01
Abstract:There are many studies on the early development of Frankfurt School,in which Carl Gruenberg and Henryk Grossman were two key figures. The main contributions by Grossman are the analyses on the law of capitalist accumulation and breakdown,and the elucidations of capitalist crises. Based on arguments between the"new harmonists"and Rosa Ruxemburg in the Second International, Grossman made a systematic interpretation of the structure and method in Marx's Capital. He argued that the changes in the structures of Capital reflected the Marx's illuminations of capitalist breakdown with the method procedure from the abstract to the concrete,and from the simple to the complex. With the procedure from value scheme to reproduction scheme,and then to value-production price transformation and the general profit,Marx provided a systematic analysis of the concrete reality-capitalist mode of production. After Max Horkheimer's becoming the dean of Institute of Social Research,Grossman gradually left the Frankfurt School because of the difference between his approaches and the critical theory. The target of this article is to considerate Grossman's ideas on Capital,the early development in Frankfurt School and the unity between critique of political economy and critical theory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?