Abstract:s (as received and not edited) of papersthat are to be pre-circulated before conference itself; listed alphabetically by author’s surname (in BOLD): (1) “Humane Responsibility Overrides Sovereignty—On Mencius’s Just War Theory” Tongdong BAI Fudan University Abstract: The starting point of Mencius’s just war theory is humaneness or humanity (ren, also translated as “benevolence”). According to it, whether a defensive or an aggressive war is just depends on the principle that “humane responsibility overrides sovereignty.” Mencius specifies detailed conditions and signs for a war to be considered just, and he explains his understanding of the relations between humane governance and the strength of a state. These ideas demonstrate the realistic side of Mencius, a Confucian who is commonly considered (overly?) idealistic. After illustrating Mencius’s theory of a just war, The starting point of Mencius’s just war theory is humaneness or humanity (ren, also translated as “benevolence”). According to it, whether a defensive or an aggressive war is just depends on the principle that “humane responsibility overrides sovereignty.” Mencius specifies detailed conditions and signs for a war to be considered just, and he explains his understanding of the relations between humane governance and the strength of a state. These ideas demonstrate the realistic side of Mencius, a Confucian who is commonly considered (overly?) idealistic. After illustrating Mencius’s theory of a just war, I will compare it with the Western mainstream theory that advocates “human rights override sovereignty” as well as the newly developed doctrine of the responsibility to protect. I will then try to address some difficulties in Mencius’s theory. I hope that this paper offers a new perspective on the issue. _________________________________________________ (2) “Human Dignity and Rights Forfeiture in Western and Neo-Confucian Thought” Ed BARRETT U.S. Naval Academy Abstract: This paper explores the relationships between human dignity, human rights and warfare ethics in Western and Confucian thought. The first part analyzes the relationship between dignity and rights forfeiture from a Western philosophical perspective, and then This paper explores the relationships between human dignity, human rights and warfare ethics in Western and Confucian thought. The first part analyzes the relationship between dignity and rights forfeiture from a Western philosophical perspective, and then applies this analysis to several recent warfare ethics debates, including the debate between the rights-based Walzerian and revisionist schools of just war theorizing. The second part examines theories of human dignity and rights forfeiture in several Confucian and neo-Confucian thinkers, and ultimately argues that some of these theories are compatible with—and can fruitfully inform—the Western just war perspective. _______________________________________________

Triple Perspective of the Relationship between Sovereignty and Human Rights

On the Essence of “Human Rights above Sovereignty”

The Hypothesis of Cultural Differences in Sino-Us Relation with International Political Conflicts

On the Contemporary Development and Rational Choice of State Sovereignty

How to Think about Cyber Sovereignty: the Case of China

On the Interrelationship among the Right,Rights,and Human Rights

On the Relationship between Culture and International Relations Studies

Historical Studies of Sovereignty and Its Future Reformation

Toward a Postmodern Notion of Human Rights

The Conceptual Gap on Sovereignty and Its Implications on China-Europe Relations

On the dual implications of the realization of the value of human rights

On the Explanation of Real Right's Justice

Sovereignty, Human Rights and Moral Values in International Dialogues: Historical Commentary on Two Peace Pastoral Letters Issued by American Catholic Bishops

Managing the Conceptual Gap on Sovereignty in China–EU Relations

Intersecting Visions of Justice: The Philosophical Tapestry of Human Rights and Human Nature in the Thoughts of Macintyre, Arendt, Nino, and Habermas

From "people's Sovereignty" to "human Right"--Vicissitude of Study Mode of Science of Constitution in China

The Norms Governing the Power——review of Normal Power,jurisprudential Research of Power

Reflections on the Human Rights View of Building a Community of a Shared Future for Mankind in the Perspectives of Institutionalization and the Belt and Road Initiative

A Reflection Upon People from Constitutional Law Perspective

Sovereignty and Network Sovereignty

Humane Responsibility Overrides Sovereignty — On Mencius ’ s Just War Theory ”