Comparative study on the development degree of China's 7 pilot carbon markets

YI Lan,LI Zhao-peng,YANG Li,LIU Jie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12062/cpre.20170913
2018-01-01
China Population Resources and Environment
Abstract:It has been widely accepted that the essence of carbon market is solving environmental problem through market mechanism,and gaining environmental benefit is the fundamental purpose of establishing the carbon market.It is no doubt that market mechanism is the key measure,policies and regulations are the important guarantee for orderly carbon market.Therefore,this paper constructs an evaluation index system composed of 34 detailed sub indexes in three dimensions,such as environmental constraint force,market resource allocation ability and supporting policies and facility completeness.Through analyzing the operation data from 2013 to 2016,the weights of the indexes are obtained.Combined with the experts' opinions from over 10 institutes including exchanges,consultancy firms and research institutions in China,this paper makes a comprehensive evaluation for the current development of 7 pilot carbon markets.Results show that:① Although the pilot carbon markets with private SMEs as the main bodies of emissions control have relatively higher environmental constraint force,but too many main bodies increase the difficulty of market performance management,and the pilots with high energy-consuming state-owned companies as the main bodies of emissions control demonstrate a phenomenon of ‘ high market performance rate with low trading volume’.②The resource allocation capability of Chinese carbon market has not been fully effective,and low degree of market participation has become an important constraint factor for market development.③Due to the lack of laws and regulations at the national macro-level,the legally bonding force of the pilot markets construction is insufficient obviously,and the supporting policies are also lack of foresights.④Generally,the development of Chinese carbon market is still in such a fragmented state in the aspects of environment,market and policy development,and the market operation has not achieved the purpose of solving environmental problems through market mechanisms.Accordingly,it puts forward following policy recommendations:① Tightening the allowance of free quota and progressively increasing the auction proportion;②improving legal construction,developing the legal effect of market operation;③increasing construction of carbon finance services and products and standardizing the order of market transactions;④enhancing capacity building of local governments and promoting the participation willingness and capability of emissions control bodies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?