Abstract:At present, the world's natural resources, ecological environment, and other security issues are becoming increasingly prominent; how to use natural resources to develop the economy and achieve the coordinated development of economic, social and ecological benefits is of great importance. Affected by the rapid population growth and extensive production and lifestyle, China also faces the dilemma of lack of resources and deterioration of the ecological environment. China has proposed a national sustainable development strategy to break through the predicament, including returning farmland to forests. Taking Qingyuan Manchu Autonomous County in China as an example, this paper used the multivariate linear regression analysis to explore the effects of five kinds of livelihood capital on non-agricultural income and the impact of farmers' livelihood capital on non-agricultural income with the regulatory implications of returning farmland to forests. The results show that: (1) Human capital, physical capital, financial capital, and social capital all have significant positive effects on nonfarm income, and natural capital, which has a significant negative effect on nonfarm income. Natural resources such as arable land and forest land are the natural capital that farmers depend on for survival, and the foundation must be protected.In terms of human capital, it is important not only to ensure the number of household laborers but also to improve the labor force's mastery of new technologies and skills. The increase in physical capital, such as basic means of production and infrastructure tools, the increase in funds at the disposal of the farm household, and the higher social capital, such as the presence of relatives who are cadres and the degree of interaction with relatives, all contribute to the transition from farm to non-farm and contribute significantly to the income of the farm household. (2) Results on the impact of livelihood capital on non-agricultural income based on the adjustment effect of returning farmland to forests: Except for the impact of social capital on non-agricultural income, the impact of the other four types of capital on non-agricultural income is significant, but the significance level is inconsistent, of which the impact of natural capital and human capital on non-agricultural income is significant at the 1%level, the impact of physical capital on non-agricultural income is significant at the 5% level, and the impact of financial capital on non-agricultural income is significant at the 10% level. The study puts forward suggestions such as increasing the subsidies for the policy of returning farmland to forest, and for the actual characteristics of the region, it is targeted to propose and develop the subsidy standards for returning farmland to forest. At the same time, increasing the subsidies for farmers, improving the ability of farmers to maintain and enhance social relations, increasing the credit support policies for farmers, and continuing to explore new ways to promote farmers' income.

Impact of capital endowment on peasants' willingness to invest in green production: Taking crop straw returning to the field as an example

Capital endowments and adoption of agricultural green production technologies in China: A meta-regression analysis review

An Empirical Study of Factors Influencing the Willingness of Peasants for Large——scale Land Management:An Analysis Based on Survey in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River

How Does Capital Endowment Impact Farmers' Green Production Behavior? Perspectives on Ecological Cognition and Environmental Regulation

Environmental policy and farmers' active straw return: administrative guidance or economic reward and punishment

Learning from parents and friends: The influence of intergenerational effect and peer effect on farmers' straw return

A study on farmers' willingness to adopt environmental-friendly technology from stratification angle:Taking straw returning as an example

Simultaneous Decisions to Undertake Off-Farm Work and Straw Return: The Role of Cognitive Ability

Farmers’ Cognition of and Satisfaction with Policy Affect Willingness of Returning Straw to Field: Based on Evolutionary Game Perspective

Public preferences and willingness to pay for environmental benefits of straw return: Empirical evidence from Northeast China

Farmers’ Endowments, Technology Perception and Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior

Effect of land transfer on farmers' willingness to pay for straw return in Southwest China

Impacts of Capital Endowment on Farmers’ Choices in Fertilizer-Reduction and Efficiency-Increasing Technologies (preferences, Influences, and Mechanisms): A Case Study of Apple Farmers in the Provinces of Shaanxi and Gansu, China

The Influences of Government Behaviors on Farmers' Willingness of Straw Resource Utilization:From the Perspectives of Incentives and Restrictions

Research on Government Regulations, Cognition and Farmers’ Willingness of Straw-to-Field

Impact of family endowment and cognitive preferences on farmers' willingness to manage, maintain and invest in the achievement of Grain for Green Project

Analysis on the Influence of the Farmers’ Livelihood Capitals on Planting Decisions in Alpine Farming-Pastoral Ecotone—A Case Study of Zhagana Agriculture-Forestry-Animal Husbandry Composite System

The Impact of Land Transfer on Conservation Tillage Investment of Farmers: an Empirical Study Based on Sectional Data of Four Provinces

Perceptions, Risk Attitude and Organic Fertilizer Investment: Evidence from Rice and Banana Farmers in Guangxi, China

Livelihood Capital, Ecological Cognition, and Farmers’ Green Production Behavior

The Effect of Farmers' Livelihood Capital on Non-agricultural Income Based on the Regulatory Effect of Returning Farmland to Forests: A Case Study of Qingyuan Manchu Autonomous County in China