The Orphan of Zhao
P. Richards
2012-07-01
Abstract:Review o/The Orphan of Zhao, a new adaptation by James Fenton, directed by Gregory Doran, Royal Shakespeare Company, Stratford-Upon-Avon, winter season 2012-13.Narratives relating to the massacre of the Zhao clan and the survival of a sole male child, destined to enact revenge, can be traced back to the fifth century BCE. It emerged as zaju, or mixed form play, The Great Revenge of the Orphan of Zhao by Ji Junziang, during the Yuan era in the thirteenth century. It is regarded as one of greatest historical tragedies from China, as a Chinese Hamlet, and has been adapted into various regional operas forms including Peking Opera, Cantonese Opera, Yue Opera, Teochew Opera, modern drama, novel, and recently into the film Sacrifice directed by Chen Kaige. The Orphan was the first Chinese play to be translated into a European language albeit much truncated and with the songs cut out, as L'Orphelin de la Maison de Tchao, by the Jesuit priest Joseph Henri Marie de Premare, published in 1735.The various versions of the Chinese narrative and play are seen by scholars as reflecting changes in politics and culture - versions differently emphasizing Confucian values- ancestor worship, loyalty, or concentrating, as in Ji Junziang's play on the need to combat evil- such as the Mongol invaders and rulers. This plasticity of purpose and adaptability to the prevailing cultural and political needs continued to mark the play on its entry into the West. William Hatchett's never staged 1741 version, The Chinese Orphan an Historical Tragedy, was an attack on Sir Robert Walpole, while the most famous of eighteenth-century versions, that of Voltaire, L'Orphelin de la Chine, 1753, turned the tale into an enlightened drama of rationality over violence and barbarism. To achieve this remarkable version of a violent tale of massacre and revenge, Voltaire was obliged to change rather a lot. The tyrant in Voltaire's play is Ghengis Khan, who has invaded China and seeks to destroy the infant ruler. However, in the end, Ghengis Khan sees the wisdom of the enlightened, kindly and respectful rule of the educated and rational Chinese. Voltaire claims in his dedication of the play to Monseigneur le marechal, duc de Richelieu that the invaders did not destroy but on the contrary they protected the arts established in China and adopted all their laws: "Voila un grand exemple de la superiorite naturelle que donnent la raison et la genie sur la force aveugle et barbare." In Voltaire's play there are no revenge killings, not by Ghengis Khan (in love with but spurned by the Orphan's mother) nor by the Orphan. Admittedly Ghengis Khan's remorse and change of heart and mind and embrace of rational and civilized values is rather last minute as the Khan now turns himself into the protector of innocence and a good ruler:Je viens vous reunir; je viens vous proteger.Veillez, heureux epoux sur l'innocente vieDel'enfant de vos Rois, que ma main vous confie.Parle droit des combats j'en pouvais disposer;Je vous remets ce droit don't j'allais abuser.Croyez, qu'a cet enfant heureux dans sa misere,Ainsi qu'a votre fils, je tiendrai lieu de pere.Vous verrez si l'on peut si fier a ma foiJe fus un conquerant, vous m'avez fait un RoiThe Irish playwright Arthur Murphy drew both on Premare and Voltaire for his tragedy, The Orphan of China first performed in 1759. Murphy restored the revenge tale, which Voltaire had omitted, and cut out the love of Gengis Khan for Idame, the Orphans mother (which he considered out of place in a tragedy). However, he retained some of Voltaire's characteristic elements, such as keeping alive both the Orphan and the boy who in Ji Junziang s play is sacrificed to enable the Orphan to be saved. …
History,Philosophy