On Academic and Administrative Control over the English Translation of Chinese Company Profiles

陈刚,俞旭燕
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942x.2004.02.014
2004-01-01
Abstract:Since China's reform and opening-up, it has not been uncommon that Chinese companies advertise themselves overseas through mass media to establish their own CI, promote their own products and increase their won market share. It has not been uncommon either, however, that there are various translation problems in the advertised versions in English. These problems did arouse criticism from such China' s national journals as Chinese Translators Journal, which, however, failed to pinpoint their academic and administrative causes. The said problems involve lack of the management: an academic control over translation as process and product, and an administrative and academic control over both the eligibility and the grade of translators and translation agencies that render service to the companies. The theoretical guideline for the academic control is Functionalism and Peter Newmark' s theory of text types and related translation methods. The administrative and academic control is the certification of the qualifications, the grade and the version of the translator (including the translation organization or agency) . By making use of the above-mentioned theories and making a typical case study of the translation of a Chinese company profile available in many issues of the Government-run news agency magazine Outlook Weekly in worldwide circulation, the authors look into the text type and stylistic features of company profiles, identify common problems in their English translations, and propose translation strategies and methods, while pointing out that the double management would be a labor loss unless the relevant administrative and academic departments under the central and local governments work closely in taking effective measures to upgrade and guarantee the quality of the translation of Chinese company profiles. The results management of translation means the management of the translated version. Its operation is rewriting based on the skopestheorie, whereas its logic lies in the power of discourse over translation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?