On the Literary Form Ontology of the Theoretical Critical Vision in the New Era

黄擎

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942x.2003.02.012

2003-01-01

Abstract:Literary form ontology directly stems from the debate of literary form ontological criticism, claiming that text, language and form constitute the socalled literary ontology. The literary form ontology found its way into the theoretical criticism of the new era with a vigorous drive, once becoming a decisive valuedimension dominating literary creation and criticism. Briefly speaking, literary form ontology undertakes three phases: work ontology criticism, work form ontology and text form ontology.In the early new era, people began to question the onceprevalent socialideological oriented criticism which simply reduced literature to nothing but the slave and instrument of politics, proposing a fundamental opposition between the literary (poetic) use of language and the practical use of language. Some proponents and elaborators of literary form ontology, represented by Liu Zaifu, Sun Ke and Chen Xiaoming, viewed literary text as an existence independence of social and ideological values. Among literary form ontological developments are two prominent models. One is the work form ontology, which investigates the formal features inherent in a specific work, thinking that the work form ontology is built upon its concrete form essentials. But it remains controversial to clearly define which form can constitute the literary ontology. The other one is the form ontology, which endows forms with a superorganic value, viewing the abstract form as the ontology of the literature. The form ontology is represented by three prominent ideas: one is represented by Li Jie, Tang Yue, Tan Xuechun and so on, who conceive language to be selffocused; the second represented by Chen Guofeng who stresses the meaning and value of literary work in itself, but insists on subject matter being contained in form and literary ontology in form; the third represented by Yu Zhaoping who spurns the subject matter and views pure form as the literary ontology.It cannot be denied that the literary form ontology, owing to its concern with the liteariness of literature, with the foregrounding of new ideas and new visions and with the aesthetic features of literary forms in the literary criticism, is conducive to the reexamination of the formandsubject relation and the reestablishment of a justifiable formsubject view. However, the literary form ontology fails to recognize the dialectic relationship between form and subject, splits the organic tie between the inner and the outer and onesidedly stresses the superiority of form over the subject. As a result, the advocacy and practice of literary form ontology will inevitably have some negative effect upon theoretical research and creative practice.