A Comparison of the Concept of Justice in Chinese and Western Thoughts

Xiao-mang DENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7023.2015.01.009
2015-01-01
Abstract:Besides the short-lived Mohist view, the Confucian advocation and explanation constitute the main stream of the traditional Chinese concept of justice ( Yi, 義). Even though the Confucianist theory of justice, in contrast to benevolence (Ren,仁), stresses on external social systems, it still originates from some specific moral sentiments and is equivalent to the so-called perfectly justified hierarchical relationship ( politi-cal ritual,礼) grounded on natural filial affections.On the contrary, the characteristics of justice (dike) of ancient Greece are as follows.The first, it emphasizes fairness (isos) or equal treatment to everyone.Second, it pays much attention to punishing the unjust behaviors without exception. Thirdly, the significant distinction between the worldly and the divine justice, which is profoundly illustrated by ancient Greeks, not only displays the sacred aspect of the former justice, but also makes it possible to criticize it from the perspective of the later one.At last, the very fact that the Greek principle of justice is based on reason ensures its universality and op -erability and signifies that “rule of reason” constructs the keystone of democracy in ancient Greece. The above characteristics provide the original genes for western democracy in modern ages and showcase the profound differences between the concepts of justice in traditional Chinese and Western thoughts as well.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?