Language Disorders of Children with Autism Viewed from the Perspectives of Chomsky and Foucault’s Theories

Shu-guang LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4608.2016.05.014
2016-01-01
Abstract:Autism is characterized by language disorders,which are closely related to deficiency in social skills and interpersonal communication. Concerning language acquisition,Chomsky argues that the reason why children can acquire their mother tongue rapidly with great uniformity is that they are born with the same initial state of human brain,which is termed universal grammar in his theory. The universal grammar is the essential part of human nature. Because of its strong explanatory adequacy,Chomsky’s theory has naturally become one of the mainstream theories in psychology of language. Though failing to take children with autism as his theoretical object,Chomsky holds that human beings differ from animals in nature even though they cannot speak due to the failure of their language organ. Therefore,a natural inference is that children with autism cannot be segregated as “others” biologically different from normal children. Differing from Chomsky, Foucault argues that there is no such thing as universal human nature. His archeological examination of the history of madness,however,reveals that autism is just a notion constructed by power/discourse and thus children with autism cannot be banished as “others” socially different from normal children. Though from different perspectives,the two great theorists both insist directly or indirectly that children with autism enjoy the same right to life and development as normal children.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?