A Study on the Interest Conflict Resulting from Land Adjustment in Reservoir Resettlement of the Zipingpu Reservoir
刘灵辉,陈银蓉,成楠,刘晓慧
2010-01-01
Abstract:The practice of resettlement resulting from the construction of Zipingpu reservoir adheres to the development resettlement policy and follows the principle of 'depending on land and agriculture for living'. The government would like to achieve the goals of relatively centralized resettlement at the county (city) level, and decentralized resettlement at the village group level. In order to make the migrant ' moving out smoothly, living steadily, and becoming rich progressively', the government implements resettlement through a variety of approaches as follows: moderately centralized resettlement, decentralized resettlement on the basis of household, self-employment and resettling near their friends or relatives. In the processes of resettlement, the migrant shall acquire contracted lands, private plots and homesteads in resettlement areas through government-oriented land adjustment. In terms of the resettlement plan, farmland adjustment compensation shall be 8 times of the annual output value of farmland. However, instead of appropriating the compensation in the light of the amount and quality of adjusted farmlands, the compensation is appropriated on the basis of the number of migrants that the village group accepts. The criteria are shown as follows. The government appropriates the production resettlement fees (12 000 Yuan per migrant) to the village group, and these compensations should be used to compensate for losses of adjusted homestead and farmland. Since the No.471 stipulation that was issued by the State Council and current law does not make it clear that how these production resettlement fees should be used, rules of the use of production resettlement fees are quite different with resettlement areas. According to the results of a study on resettlement areas in Du Jiangyan City, there are three usage approaches with respect to production resettlement fees. First, the production resettlement fees will be distributed between local residents and migrants. Second, the compensation can be used in infrastructure construction, and then the balance of compensation will be distributed between local residents and migrants. Third, the compensation is dominated by the village collective. Not only does the government-oriented land adjustment go against current rural land policies, but also some problems such as disordered interest distribution and the gap between revenue and expenditure among different interest parties exist in land adjustment. These problems may bring about the potential conflict among different parties. Furthermore, it would hinder a smooth implementation of reservoir resettlement in the future. Finally, for resolving the conflict among all parties arising from the process of resettlement, some countermeasures and suggestions are given as follows. First, the resettlement plan should be associated with the land use plan. Second, relevant stipulations and laws should be further perfected. In addition, the criterion as well as the usage of land adjustment compensation should be defined clearly. Third, based on the land compensation of inundation areas, the migrant should be resettled with various approaches. Fourth, in order to achieve interest aggregation of migrants and local residents, they should be treated equally.