Abstract:This paper uses the first national economic census data to systematically investigate the issue of productivity performance of China's private enterprises and their investment efficiency. Evidences indicate that the private enterprises in the material and machinery industries in the eastern area have a leading advantage of both labor and capital productivity over their counterparts in the other areas, much of which, however, is due to the outstanding performance of the large firms. An estimation of the production function leads to a robust estimates of capital elasticity between 0.2 and 0.3 in most sectors. Based on this, we decompose the variances of productivity and find that nearly 90% of the within-region and industry productivity variation stems from total factor productivity (TFP), while the contribution from capital per capita accounts for only 13%. Although the primary source of inter-industry productivity variation is still TFP, capital per capita plays an essential role in explaining the differences in productivity across regions. The marginal product of capital is found to be unequal across regions and industries, which implies that there exist some degrees of inefficiency in the allocation of private capital across sectors. Then we infer from an experimental simulation that the potential improvement is more significant if the capital is reallocated across provinces than if across industries, which implies that the inter-region barriers are more serious than inter-industry barriers for the mobility of private manufacturing capital.

Place-based Industrial Policy and Firm Productivity

Development Zones and Firms’ Performance: the Impact of Development Zones on Firms’ Performance for a Chinese Industrial Cluster

Land Use Regulation, Land Reclamation, and Industrial Productivity: Evidence from China

Industrial Policy and Economic Geography: Evidence from China

Special economic zones, export status, and firms’ productivity: Theory and evidence from China

The Impact of Special Economic Zones on Producer Services Productivity: Evidence from China

Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities

Does Place-Based Policy Increase New Firm Births? Evidence from Special Economic Zones in China

Place-Based Policies, Creation, and Agglomeration Economies: Evidence from China’s Economic Zone Program

Is the special economic zone an effective policy tool for promoting polycentricity? Evidence from China

Place-based policies and firm performance: Evidence from Special Economic Zones in India

Do Place-Based Policies Work? Micro-Level Evidence from China's Economic Zone Program

Inter-industry Relatedness and Industrial-Policy Efficiency: Evidence from China's Export Processing Zones

What Explains the Productivity Premium in China?

Geography of Productivity: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Industries

Lifting the Veil: Using a Spatial Discontinuity to Assess the Impact of National Development Zones on Upgrading of Chinese Manufacturing

Explaining the urban premium in Chinese cities and the role of place-based policies

Place-based Policies and Capital Misallocation: Evidence from Chinese Cities

The birth of edge cities in China: Measuring the effects of industrial parks policy

Productivity Performance and Investment Efficiency of China's Private Enterprises

Yesterday's Solution: Do National Economic and Technological Development Zones Promote Industrial Development in Typical Developing Regions of China?