Abstract:Summary form only given. The evaluation of the performance of R&D in China began in the 1950s, and a number of relative theories, methods and tools have been developed in the past decades. Especially, the rising costs of R&D and the increasing dependence of companies on technology for competitive advantage are causing both external investors and managers to identify the outcomes of R&D activities. As a result, the evaluation and measurement on the R&D performance by which to check the productivity, impacts and efficiency of R&D activities has became more and more important since the 1990s. The R&D activities in China involve scientific explorations, programs and projects in firms, universities and public or private research organizations. The universities and research organizations of China play a more important role than firms in R&D, especially in the field of both basic science research and applied research. It is very important to evaluate the R&D performance of universities and research organizations in China. Many popular methods and tools, such as peer review, econometrics, scientometrics, AHP, integrated indicators, are widely used in the evaluation practice, notwithstanding their own problems or limitations. It is noticeable that the internal performance of organizations' R&D activities, such as papers published, designs produced, patents, as well as R&D/sales are paid more addition to, and more relative evaluation methods are developed and adopted, while the external impacts of R&D are comparatively ignored. Generally speaking, the current evaluation work has had less of an impact and role that they deserve. This article gives a systemic summary and analysis on the current evaluation theories and methods for R&D performance, and in the meanwhile, their limitations and drawbacks are also pointed out. Based on the analysis of the characteristics and importance of the R&D activities in the coming knowledge-based economy, some promising theories and approaches with high operability and practicability are introduced by which to evaluate the R&D performance effectively.

Some Consideration on the Evaluation Problems of Scientific Research in High Institutions

Disciplinary differences and the assessment of scholarship

ON THE EVALUATION MODEL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS AND THEIR GAUGING SYSTEM IN COLLEGES/DEPARTMENTS OF UNIVERSITIES

On Building Evaluation System of Humanities and Social Sciences

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Thoughts on breaking away from the " paper-centric" orientation and establishing a new evaluation model of scientific and technological innovation in academic universities

Quality and Innovativeness in the Evaluation of Academic Journals

Problems of Faculty Evaluation in Universities of China ——Based on the Perspective of Human Resource

Consideration and Evaluation of Scientific Research Output for Departments

Thinking and Exploration on the Choosing and Appraising Mechanism of P.E Teaching and Research Personnels in China

Discussion on research performance evaluation for the tenured faculty in Chinese research oriented universities

Study on Cross Platform of Teaching Evaluation System

On Consideration of Problems in Evaluation Methods of Real Estate Industry

Evaluating R&D Effectiveness: a Study on Chinese Practice and Trend

Primary investigation on an evaluation system for teachers and teaching in research universities

Some Thoughts on University Teachers' Performance Evaluation

The Essence of Management and Evaluation of Management Research

University Faculty Performance Evaluation System in China

Analysis on the Current Situation of Scientific Research Management in Universities and Suggestions for Improvement

Construction Strategy of Evaluation Index System of Applied Scientific and Technological Achievements

Value Pursuit in Teacher Evaluation:from a Scientific Development View