A feasibility analysis for practicing green supply chain management without government policy incentives

Yu CAO,Zi-hao LIU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2017.02.014

2017-01-01

Abstract:Green supply chain has attracted increasing attention since the 21st century because of continuous global environment deterioration and lack of natural resources.Consumers' environmental and health awareness are increasing because international environment and quality standards are becoming stricter.Given these trends,it is inevitable that supply chains will be interested in their green levels and learning about how to implement green supply chain management (GSCM).At present in China,game analysis on the implementation of green supply chain management has not addressed the following questions comprehensively:(1) too much emphasis is placed on the role of government will bring additional cost and further influence the whole social welfare,(2) game models are mostly established by assuming complete information,whereas in reality the information each one owns is often asymmetric,and (3) the comparison between cooperative and non-cooperative decision making in multi-stage supply chains is insufficient.In view of the abovementioned problems,this article attempts to compare cooperative decision making and non-cooperative decision making in a green supply chain,and then further analyzes the drivers influencing the feasibility of implementing green chain management without government policy incentives.Specifically,this paper models a three-level supply chain with a supplier,a manufacturer and a retailer.The first part of this paper establishes three game models considering no government policy incentives and reformation asymmetry:the non-conperative Three-level Leader-follower Game (TLG),Stackelberg Model (SG) involving the alliance of the supplier and the manufacturer,and Cooperative Decision Game (CDG) with a revenue sharing contract.By solving and analyzing the three game models,we find that when information asymmetry exists,the revenue of the whole channel under cooperation is always greater than that under noncooperation.Moreover,the revenue of each member in the supply chain under cooperation exceeds that under noncooperation.Namely,non-cooperative decision-naking achieves Pareto improvement via converting into cooperative decision-making.Finally,we can always coordinate non-cooperative supply chains via revenue sharing contract.Based on the models established above,the second part of this article investigates the driving factors for implementing green chain management by numerical simulation.The analysis results show that (1) consumers' green preferences k,the price of the ordinary product P0 and the green degree of green products (θh-θi) are positive driving factors;green cost (cs + cm) and the initial market share q0 are negative drivers,and when (cs + cm) rises to some certain point,it turns to be a positive role,(2) the initial market share of the supply chain significantly affects the initiative of implementation of supply chain management.The smaller the market share of the supply chain,the more willing the supply chain is to implement green supply chain management.The larger the market share,the more reluctant it is to take the initiative to implement green supply chain management.(3) the whole channel revenue under local alliance is not always greater than that under independent decision-making and (4) the supply chain will take the lead in implementing the green supply chain management under influence of positive drivers and delay abandoning the green supply chain management under the influence of negative drivers.Overall,we find that in a competitive market,the implementation of supply chain management can be feasible and does not necessarily need government policy incentives.It is worth noting that under information asymmetry,cooperation is more conducive to the implementation of green chain management and brings greater revenue to the whole channel as well as each member.Cooperation can always be achieved through a revenue sharing contract.