Abstract:Ambidextrous leadership is key to solving organizational tension and complex problems. This type of leadership has gained attention in the field of organizational behavior in recent years. Ambidextrous leadership refers to a set of two complementary leadership behaviors and the flexibility switch between two different behaviors. Existing studies noted the extensive benefits of ambidextrous leadership to employees and organizations. These advantages include enhancement of the psychological empowerment of employees, exploratory and exploitative behaviors, innovation, and organizational change. Prior studies focused on ambidextrous leadership from the Western context. These studies include opening-closing leadership and transformational-transactional leadership. However, the consequences of indigenous ambidextrous leadership in the Chinese context remain poorly understood. A particular ambidextrous leadership embedded in Chinese culture was identified, namely, authoritarian-benevolent leadership. The present study focuses on the combination of authoritarian and benevolent leadership, which is regarded as a type of indigenous ambidextrous leadership. The researchers aimed to investigate the effect of different combination modes of benevolent and authoritarian leadership on the work outcome of subordinates and its underlying mechanism. The researchers identified four scenarios by combining the two kinds of leadership, namely, high authority-high benevolence, low authority-low benevolence, high authority-low benevolence, low authority-high benevolence. This approach was based on the level of authoritarian and benevolent leadership. The former two forms of leadership fall under the congruence category, whereas the latter two fall under the incongruence category. By drawing on followership theory, the researchers expected that the active implementation of subordinates was high when leaders were at a high level of authoritarian leadership and benevolent leadership than when at a low level of authoritarian leadership and benevolent leadership. The researchers also found that the active implementation of subordinates was high when the benevolent leadership of leaders exceeded authoritarian leadership rather than when authoritarian leadership exceeded benevolent leadership. Third, the active implementation of subordinates carried the joint effect of benevolent and authority leadership to the job performance of followers. A multiwave, multiresource survey was used to test the hypotheses. Surveys were given to 204 voluntary subordinates at Time 1. They were required to report their leaders' benevolent leadership and authoritarian leadership and demographic information. The researchers obtained 183 effective survey responses. After one month, the researchers conducted Time 2 survey, which required leaders to rate the job performance of their subordinates. The subordinates were then required to rate their active implementation. A total of 130 effective survey responses were obtained. The researchers used polynomial regression combined with response surface analysis based on the two-wave data. The results supported the hypotheses. The findings offered several contributions to literature. First, different combination modes of benevolent and authoritarian leadership have different effects on the work outcome of subordinates. Second, the researchers uncovered the dynamics between authoritarian-benevolent leadership and work outcome of subordinates. These findings can aid Chinese scholars to gain an improved understanding of indigenous ambidextrous leadership. These findings advance the understanding on how authoritarian leadership combined with benevolent leadership affects the performance of followers. The findings also provide further practical insights to practitioners.

Basic-Level Leadership Behavior and Its Effectiveness

Effects of Perceptions on LMX and Work Performance: Effects of Supervisors’ Perception of Subordinates’ Emotional Intelligence and Subordinates’ Perception of Trust in the Supervisor on LMX And, Consequently, Performance

Effect of Leader and Follower Emotional Intelligence on LMX and Followers' Job Outcomes

Examining the Role of Personal Identification With the Leader in Leadership Effectiveness

Revisiting the mediating role of trust in transformational leadership effects: Do different types of trust make a difference?

Examining The Role Of Personal Identification With The Leader In Leadership Effectiveness: A Partial Nomological Network

The Impact of Participative Leadership on Job Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Distinguishing Between the Mediating Effects of Affective and Cognitive Trust

Leader-Member Exchange As A,Mediator of the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Followers' Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

The antecedents and outcomes of transformational leadership: leader's self-transcendent value, follower's environmental commitment and behavior

The Effect of Transformational Leadership on Follower Performance and Satisfaction: the Mediating Role of Psychological Capital and the Moderating Role of Procedural Justice

The Role of Leadership Behaviors for Enhancing Organizational Effectiveness in the Chinese Public Sector

Supervisors' upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment.

Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Reactions to Organizational Change: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis

The Effect of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Commitment and Work Performance

Leadership Styles and Employees’ Job-Related Attitudes: an Empirical Study on the Mediating Effects of Reciprocity and Trust

The Diminishing Effect of Transformational Leadership on the Relationship Between Task Characteristics, Perceived Meaningfulness, and Work Engagement

Transformational Leadership and Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement

Environmentally Specific Transformational Leadership and Employee’s Pro-environmental Behavior: The Mediating Roles of Environmental Passion and Autonomous Motivation

Authoritarian-benevolent Leadership, Active Implementation and Job Performance: an Investigation on the Effectiveness of Ambidextrous Leadership in the Chinese Context

Full range leadership style and its effect on effectiveness, employee satisfaction, and extra effort: an empirical study

The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Individual and Team Performance: Evidence from Knowledge Work Teams