Innovation Network Structure and Innovative Performance: A Study of China's Electronic Information Industry
Zhou Can,Zeng Gang,Wang Fenglong,Si Yuefang,Mi Zefeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.05.003
2017-01-01
Abstract:In recent years, the innovation network metaphor has become commonplace within the economic ge-ography, with a large and growing body of scholarly research focused on analyzing the impact of innovation network structures on knowledge flows and innovation outcomes. By using Ucinet, ArcGIS and Stata, this arti-cle aims to analyze the topology structure, spatial structure and the evolution of innovation networks of China' s electronic information industry, and the relationship between network structure and innovative performance based on the co-patent data issued by the State Intellectual Property Office of P R China from 1985 to 2013. The main findings of this study are drawn as follows. 1) The innovation network scale of China's electronic in-formation industry has a rapid growth from 1985 to 2013. From the university perspective, those actors at the center of the network are Tsinghua University, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Peking University, Zhejiang Uni-versity, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Huazhong University of Science and Technology and Xi'an Jiaotong University. From the perspective of firms within the network, Huawei, Haier and China Mo-bile are found to possess the highest rates of centrality. It is noticeable that prestigious universities and large en-terprises are the most influential actors within innovation network of China's electronic information industry, and through their structurally central positions they are the most important bridging and connecting agents in the process of building innovation networks. The network characteristic is found to be clearly different from the United States and Western Europe, multinational corporations and small enterprises holding central and in-fluential positions, respectively. 2) The overall structure of collaborative innovation networks features a"core-peripheral"paradigm and"small world"network properties, whereby dense clusters of network actors are linked to other clusters via a relatively small number of bridging links. 3) City level and overseas level are the major geographical scales of collaboration innovation. Geographic proximity plays an important role in in-creasing the likelihood of actors inside of China to form innovation partnerships, while technological proximi-ty is the base for the foreign collaborative innovation. Knowledge sourced from external providers is consid-ered to be a key factor within innovation processes of China's electronic information industry. This finding of-fers support for"local buzz and global pipelines"hypothesis proposed by Harald Bathelt. 4) Analytically, the significant relationship is found between network structure and the rate of innovation. A strong network posi-tion and structural hole of an actor tends to increase their innovative performance. 5) The analysis has shown that structural embeddedness has negative impacts on innovation actors in eastern China. In general, the results demonstrate that knowledge flows among innovation actors in the leading regions to be unnecessarily spatially constrained, as opposed to innovation actors in central and the western China, geographic proximity facilitates tacit knowledge communication and improves innovation performance. In summary, it is clearly that the net-work space occupied by actors, defined by the nature of the relationships, may be equally, if not more impor-tant than the geographic space within which actors are located and interact. In order to better understand the in-novative performance of actors, it is necessary to consider the notion of"network capital", which refers to the value actors gain from the knowledge they are able to access from their networks as a means of innovating.