Abstract:The common approach to compositional data analysis is to transform the data by means of logratios. Logratios between pairs of compositional parts (pairwise logratios) are the easiest to interpret in many research problems. When the number of parts is large, some form of logratio selection is a must, for instance by means of an unsupervised learning method based on a stepwise selection of the pairwise logratios that explain the largest percentage of the logratio variance in the compositional dataset. In this article we present three alternative stepwise supervised learning methods to select the pairwise logratios that best explain a dependent variable in a generalized linear model, each geared for a specific problem. The first method features unrestricted search, where any pairwise logratio can be selected. This method has a complex interpretation if some pairs of parts in the logratios overlap, but it leads to the most accurate predictions. The second method restricts parts to occur only once, which makes the corresponding logratios intuitively interpretable. The third method uses additive logratios, so that $K-1$ selected logratios involve exactly $K$ parts. This method in fact searches for the subcomposition with the highest explanatory power. Once the subcomposition is identified, the researcher's favourite logratio representation may be used in subsequent analyses, not only pairwise logratios. Our methodology allows logratios or non-compositional covariates to be forced into the models based on theoretical knowledge, and various stopping criteria are available based on information measures or statistical significance with the Bonferroni correction. We present an illustration of the three approaches on a dataset from a study predicting Crohn's disease. The first method excels in terms of predictive power, and the other two in interpretability.

Discriminant Analysis Method for Compositional Data Based on An Isometric Logratio Transformation

Spatial Hyperspheric Models for Compositional Data

Computational and Theoretical Analysis of Supervised Dimensionality Reduction

Error Propagation in Isometric Log-ratio Coordinates for Compositional Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations

Units Recovery Methods in Compositional Data Analysis

Amalgamations are valid in compositional data analysis, can be used in agglomerative clustering, and their logratios have an inverse transformation

Three approaches to supervised learning for compositional data with pairwise logratios

Classical and Robust Regression Analysis with Compositional Data

The chiPower transformation: a valid alternative to logratio transformations in compositional data analysis

Two-sample Tests of High-Dimensional Means for Compositional Data

High-dimensional log contrast models with measurement errors

On the distribution of isometric log-ratio transformations under extra-multinomial count data

Empirical observations on the effects of data transformation in machine learning classification of geological domains

Identifying Important Pairwise Logratios in Compositional Data with Sparse Principal Component Analysis

Likelihood analysis for a class of spatial geostatistical compositional models

Dirichlet component analysis: feature extraction for compositional data

Robust Covariance Matrix Estimation for High-Dimensional Compositional Data with Application to Sales Data Analysis

A novel, divergence based, regression for compositional data

Principal balances of compositional data for regression and classification using partial least squares

Large Covariance Estimation for Compositional Data Via Composition-Adjusted Thresholding

Gaussian Asymptotic Limits for the α-transformation in the Analysis of Compositional Data