Abstract:The trisecting–acting–outcome (TAO) model of three-way decision plays a crucial role in solving complex problems. It comprises three components: trisecting, acting, and outcome. Trisecting means dividing an entire set into three relatively small parts based on an evaluation function, and acting means designing the corresponding action to apply to these three parts. The outcome denotes evaluation effectiveness based on the first two steps. Several previous investigations have measured effects from a coarse-grained perspective. Still, they have not considered the impact of fine-grained changes in objects and have not devised the method of selecting a strategy-constructed tripartition for a given expected outcome. The present study aimed to explore the outcome measure from the view of fine-grained changes in objects named change-based three-way decision. It also provides a novel approach to quantifying outcomes using utility theory. Specifically, we conducted the study using two perspectives: top-down and bottom-up, depending on the decision demands. The object is first divided into three regions based on changes corresponding to different utilities from the top-down view. Then, the overall utility is aggregated based on the particular utility metrics representing different satisfaction levels in the three regions. From the bottom-up perspective, we derive a pair of thresholds based on the desired utility of the decision-maker and thus obtain three parts whose changes can make by some action to achieve these effects. The principal conclusions of this exploration are that outcomes can be better ranked using objects’ changes using utility theory and that strategies can be better acting to achieve corresponding variations based on the expected utility of the decision-maker. We describe the specific steps and procedures of the proposed method through several examples. The findings presented in this paper add to our understanding of the outcome measure for the three-way decision.

An Evaluation Method of Self-determination for Better Action Conforming to Natural Rules Based on Evaluated Objects' Advantage Identification

A MODEL OF MULTI-OBJECTIVE COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION FOR POWER PLANT PROJECTS

User Behavior Redibility Evaluation Model Based on AHP and Rough Set and Game Theory

Multi-Attribute Decision Making Model for Customer Evaluation and Selection in Electricity Market

Corporate Social Responsibility Performance-Evaluation Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model

The Index System of Social Influence Evaluation Adaptable to China's Situation

Practical evaluation of intelligent algorithms in ESG management of manufacturing enterprises

A Novel Prospect-Theory-based Three-Way Decision Methodology in Multi-Scale Information Systems

Models Versus Satisfaction: Towards a Better Understanding of Evaluation Metrics

Evaluation on the development of philosophical social science

Research on Comprehensive Quality Evaluation Method Based on Cooperative Performance.

Measure Effectiveness of Change-based Three-way Decision Using Utility Theory

An ESG Assessment Approach with Multi-Agent Preference Differences: Based on Fuzzy Reasoning and Group Decision-Making

Multiple-attribute and Multilevel Synthetic Evaluation Model and Its Application

Construction And Application Of Evaluation Index System For Relative Value Of Human Capital In Enterprises

Multi-attribute Evaluation Model and Application on the Social Responsibility of Power Enterprise

Research of Integrated Performance Evaluation Based on Enterprise Strategy

Evidential-Reasoning-Type Multi-Attribute Large Group Decision-Making Method Based on Public Satisfaction

Research on the performance evaluation system of private enterprise based on AHP and PCA

Evaluation of automobile parts design scheme for intelligent manufacturing