Abstract:The cross-efficiency method is an effective way to rank decision-making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis. The traditional approach for cross-efficiency aggregation relies on an equally weighted average that ignores their relative importance. Although many aggregation methods based on prospect theory and Shannon entropy have been proposed by scholars, there are still some drawbacks in existing cross-efficiency aggregation approaches. First, the subjective weighting method based on prospect theory cannot reflect the preference of the decision maker (DM) in a more flexible way. Second, the determination of aggregation weights only considers a single perspective that may not comprehensively reflect the decision information. To address these deficiencies, this study proposes a new method for deriving meaningful aggregation weights from subjective and objective perspectives. From a subjective perspective, prospect theory is introduced to reflect the preference of DM, and this method provides an interval of reference point that is able to select such a reference point in light of the DMs’ preferences and decision goals. The idea of variance is then used to reflect the degree of deviation between peer-evaluation efficiency and self-evaluation efficiency, and objective weights are obtained. Moreover, an optimization model is constructed to obtain integrated weights that reflect both the subjective preference of the DM and the intrinsic objective information contained in the cross-efficiency matrix. Finally, two numerical examples are examined to illustrate the effectiveness and rationality of the proposed method.

The Linear Combination Weights Method Based on Maximum Entropy Principle

Optimal Capital Allocation Based on Weighted-Mean-Variance Principle

Combination Weighting Approach Based on Deviation Function and Joint-Entropy

On Weighted Lower and Upper Possibilistic Means and Variances of Fuzzy Numbers and Its Application in Decision

An Integrated Approach Towards Modeling Ranked Weights

A Monotonous Method Based on Maximal Entropy Function in Nonlinear Programming

Model and Approach for Determining the Compromise Weight of Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Problem

Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis based on the satisfaction degree

Portfolio Weighting Approach of Intensive Land Use Evaluation Based on Entropy and Deviation Function: A Case Study of YuHuan Economic Development Zones

Efficiency ranking with common set of weights based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree.

A Study on Eliminating Correlation of Evaluation Index and Obtaining Modified Weights

Weights generation models based on acceptance degrees in decision making

A Distance Model of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cross Entropy to Solve Preference Problem on Alternatives

A method to determine the integrated weights of cross-efficiency aggregation

The Use of Information Entropy and Expert Opinion in Maximizing the Discriminating Power of Composite Indicators

Vendor-selection Method Based on the Optimal Combining Weight and Its Application

Reliability Allocation Method Based on 2-Tuple Linguistic Weighted Muirhead Mean Operator and 2-Tuple Linguistic Best-Worst Method

Potential optimality and robust optimality in multiattribute decision analysis with incomplete information: A comparative study.

ON RANKING OF ALTERNATIVES IN UNCERTAIN GROUP DECISION MAKING MODEL

Optimal Linear Combination Using Decision Reliability Of Individual Classifiers

Optimal consistency adjustment strategy and benevolent multiplicative data envelopment analysis for group decision-making with interval-probabilistic linguistic preference relations