Abstract:This paper investigates a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) consisting of a manufacturer, a distributor, and a retailer, where the retailer exhibits fairness concerns. Cooperative and non-cooperative game theoretic analyses are employed to characterize interactions among different parties. Analytical results confirm the conventional wisdom: with the retailer's fairness concerns, the channel profits under the decentralized and partial-coalition models underperform that under the centralized model. To find an appropriate profit allocation scheme to coordinate the supply chain system with fairness concerns, we resort to the cooperative game theory. To this end, we first derive the characteristic function form of the cooperative game based on the equilibrium profits under centralized, decentralized and different partial-coalition models. Subsequently, we propose three coordination mechanisms based on the Shapley value, nucleolus solution, and equal satisfaction to allocate surplus profit. The three mechanisms are then evaluated by using numerical experiments. We further examine how the retailer's fairness concerns affect profit allocation under the three mechanisms. The key innovation is to incorporate the retailer's fairness concerns into the coordination of a three-echelon CLSC. Our contributions are twofold: First, cooperative game-theoretic mechanisms are put forward to coordinate the three-echelon CLSC with a fairness-minded retailer. Second, we investigate how the retailer's fairness concerns affect the CLSC members' pricing decision and surplus profit allocation. Our studies confirm that the resulting profit allocation schemes satisfy both individual and collective rationality and fall in the core of the cooperative game, thereby making the grand coalition stable and suggesting viable options to coordinate the CLSC system. Further analyses reveal that different coordination mechanisms benefit the three CLSC members differently. These research findings help CLSC managers to understand what options are available and identify possible pathways for them to foster cooperation and achieve equitable allocation of surplus profit.

Profits Allocation Research Between Multi-Suppliers and Single-Retailer in Supply Chain

Profit Division Methods for Cooperative Supply Chains

Allocating the surplus induced by cooperation in distribution chains with multiple suppliers and retailers

A Profit Distribution Model in Supply Chain Based on Cooperative Game Theory

Benefit Allocation Method for Supply Chain Collaboration Based on Cooperation Game

Cooperative Game-theoretic Approach for Supplier Selection, Pricing and Inventory Decisions in a Multi-level Supply Chain

Cooperation and profit allocation in distribution chains

Profit allocation of multi-suppliers supply chain based on Shapley value

Coordination of a Three-Level Supply Chain Through Revenue Sharing

Research on equilibrium and coordination of supply chain system under multi-retailer price competition

Research on Cooperative Mechanism for a Distribution Center and n Supermarkets under the "Connecting Agriculture with Supermarket" Mode

A Multi-Supplier Single-Retailer Supply Chain Coordination Model with the Retailer Being Dominant

Profit Allocation on a Four-Echelon Supply Chain in Perspective of Cooperative Games on Augmenting Systems.

Profit Allocation in the Cooperation among the Enterprises under the Risks of Supply Chain

Supply Chain Horizontal Competition-Cooperation Game and Pricing Strategies Considering Product Green Degree

Research on Profit Allocation in Cooperative-led Agricultural Products Supply Chain

Cooperative Game Analysis of A Supply Chain with One Risk-Neutral Supplier and Two Risk-Averse Retailers

Supply Chain Enterprises Cooperative Game Analysis

A Stackelberg Game of Profit Division in Supply Chains with Dominant Firms

Cooperative Game Approaches to Coordinating a Three-Echelon Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns

Supply Chain Multilateral Negotiation under Supplier Competitions