Can Precise Poverty Alleviation Improve the Sustainable Livelihoods of Rural Poor Households? Based on the Survey of 70 Counties in Shaanxi Province

Zhenzhen WANG,Lijian WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2019.04.009
2019-01-01
Abstract:The evaluation of the implementation effect of precision poverty alleviation is not only an important mechanism for testing "true poverty alleviation" and "pro-poor poverty alleviation", it is of great significance for effectively promoting accurate poverty alleviation work. Based on the perspectives of the poor households, this study uses "sustainable livelihoods" as the standard of precision poverty alleviation assessment and analyzes them into three parts: development ability,economic ability and social ability. Based on the existing research, It is refined into an index system with 3 first-level indicators,5 second-level indicators, 14 third-level indicators and 26 fourth-level indicators. Secondly,on the basis of the field survey data from 70 counties(districts) in Shaanxi Province, this project uses TOPSIS for quantitative assessment. Then, from the perspective of the overall and the type of poor households,using ANOVA to assess the effect of precise poverty alleviation. The results show that: firstly, the overall livelihoods of poor households are generally below the middle level,and the sustainable livelihoods of ordinary poor households, low-income families and five-underloved households are successively lower,further confirming that the poor livelihoods are realized in the process of precision poverty alleviation Accurately identify; Second, the precise poverty alleviation for sustainable development of poor households did not increase significantly,but for the poor economic and social skills significantly enhance the role. Third,different measures of precision poverty alleviation have different effects on sustainable livelihoods of different poor households. However,poverty alleviation and relocation have no significant effect on promoting sustainable livelihood for different types of poor households. Fourth,precise poverty alleviation participation is not significant for sustainable livelihoods,but significantly improves the social ability of different types of poor households. Finally,based on the existing research, suggestions are made to improve the sustainable livelihoods of poor households.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?