Abstract:Overcapacity of specific industries, such as steel and coal, has been viewed as one of the most important and extensively discussed economic issues of China. The main feature of overcapacity is a massive amount of idling capacity, often considered to be a sub-optimal situation. The overcapacity of the steel industry is also closely related to low export price. Therefore, it turns out to be the most common fuse of trade disputes between China and developed economies, such as the U. S. and European Union. Since the late 1990s, the Chinese government has initiated five rounds of policies aiming to tackle with overcapacity. However, overcapacity keeps emerging periodically for some specific industries despite government's efforts. Since 2012, reducing overcapacity of particular industries has been listed as one of the primary economic goals of the Chinese government. By definition, overcapacity is a low level of capacity utilization. Therefore, the key to understanding overcapacity is to precisely measure capacity utilization rate. However, current methods of measurement, such as data envelopment analysis and stochastic production frontiers, are far from satisfaction because of either the concepts they use to define overcapacity or their underlying assumptions. Based on the definition of Greenwood et al. (1988 ) and the conceptual framework of Ackerberg et al. (2015) , we develop a new method to measure capacity utilization rate. We define the capacity utilization rate as capital utilization intensity and incorporate flexible capacity utilization rate into the production function estimation framework. Our underlying assumption is that higher capacity utilization leads to higher depreciation rate of capital. Thus, we can use capital depreciation rate as a proxy variable to estimate capacity utilization rate and total productivity factor simultaneously. Our method requires weaker assumptions, offers a more precise and intuitive characterization of overcapacity, and is more amenable to various extensions. Empirically, we apply our method to Chinese Industrial Enterprise Database. Collected and maintained by the National Bureau of Statistics, the database provides the most comprehensive micro-level information of Chinese industrial firms. It contains information on depreciation as well as inputs and outputs information for production function estimation. We estimate the capacity utilization rate and total factor productivity of Chinese industrial firms from 1998 to 2007 and from 2011 to 2013. Our results show that ignoring flexible capacity utilization would overestimate the elasticity of labor input on output and underestimate the elasticity of capital input. For most industries, this will lead to underestimation of firm-level productivity. Our results suggest that productivity of Chinese industrial firms has increased in the sample period. Compared with estimates of previous methods of capacity utilization, our estimates are much closer to the estimates obtained via direct investigation and more consistent with the macroeconomic background. Chinese industrial firms experienced an overall rise in capacity utilization rate from 1998 to 2007 and a drop around 2012. We also explored the variations in capacity utilization across firms. Firms with higher productivity, lower capital intensity, higher export intensity and profit ratio are associated with higher capacity utilization rate. Foreign-owned firms have the highest capacity utilization while state-owned enterprises have the lowest. We also observe substantial regional variations in capacity utilization across provinces. The policy implication of the results is that to tackle with overcapacity efficiently, policymakers should take into account the heterogeneity of overcapacity along different dimensions. The most important contribution of this paper lies in developing a new method of capacity utilization and utilization-adjusted total productivity factor. There are still a lot of controversies on the causes of and solutions to China's overcapacity problem. This paper tries to offer a benchmark framework to understand all these issues. We also provide some tentative and descriptive evidence to explore the variations in capacity utilization. Future research agenda concerning the mechanisms that give rise to overcapacity and the evaluation of related policies could be carried out based on the estimation strategy and results of this paper.

Input-Output Heterogeneity and Productivity Estimation of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises: 1998—2013

Industrial Productivity Performance in Chinese Regions (1987–2002): a Decomposition Approach

Productivity Performance and Investment Efficiency of China's Private Enterprises

INDUSTRIAL AND AGGREGATE MEASURES OF PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN CHINA, 1982–2000

Export and Productivity of Enterprises: Based on the Data of Chinese Listed Enterprises in Manufacturing Industry

The Performance of Industrial Productivity Across Regions of China: Structural Differences, Institutional Shocks and Dynamic Characteristics

Output Quality, Productivity Growth, and Resource Reallocation

Is Heterogeneous Capital Depreciation Important for Estimating Firm-Level Productivity? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms

Export,Heterogeneity,and Corporate Productivity:Evidence from Enterprises in China

Exports’ Effects on Productivity from the View of Industry Heterogeneity

Multi-Product Exports, Imported Inputs and Within-Firm Productivity Dispersion

Capacity Utilization Rate Measurement and Productivity Estimation for Industrial Firms

Human Capital, Industrial Heterogeneities and Productivity of Chinese Industry: Based on Perspective of the Division of Human Capital

Is Output Growth of Chinese Manufacturing Firms Input or Productivity Driven? A Flexible Production Function Approach with Endogenous Inputs

Heterogeneity and influence factors of carbon productivity: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises

Growth, development, and structural change at the firm-level: The example of the PR China

Estimation of Total Factor Productivity of Industrial Enterprises in China: 1999—2007

A Structural Method to Estimate Firm-level Capacity Utilization and Application to Chinese Heavy Industries

Productivity heterogeneity or multiple heterogeneity:an empirical study on the source of Chinese export enterprise competitiveness

Institutional Change and Productivity Growth in China ’ S Manufacturing 1998-2007 : the Micro Economics of “ Creative Restructuring ”

Firm Heterogeneity and Export:an Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Manufacturing Firm-level Data