Practice and thought on improving the enthusiasm of peer reviewer

Zuoqi DING
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2017.01.019
2017-01-01
Abstract:Peer review is a key process to ensure the quality of academic journals.However,it is well recognized that many "peers" are reluctant to participate in the peer review process and are thus ready to reject the invitation of peer review from editor.This article intends to discuss how to improve the enthusiasm of peer reviewers,based on the practice of Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines,and suggests a series of strategies:selecting potential authors as reviewers,avoiding excessive invitation,increasing the ratio of rejection in the primary review by editor,respecting the requests of reviewers,making a contact with the reviewers without feedback,and recognizing the contribution of reviewers by use of ORCID.The strategies might be expected to improve the enthusiasm of peer reviewers,and to promote the development of academic journals from the base.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?