Executive Incentive Will Affect on the Porter Hypothesis on the Enterprise Level---A Comparative Study Based on Enterprises Technological Innovation of State-owned and Private Firm

Changlong Lou,Maosheng Ran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.2015040231

2015-01-01

Abstract:There are different of the enterprise environmental protection responsibility ,motivation and external conditions between state‐owned and private firm .the existing research given environmental regulation can promote enterprise tech‐nology innovation are likely to be biased .Aiming at to resolve this problem ,and exploratory research on the effect of exec‐utive incentive in environmental regulation and technology innovation ,this article is based on the state of heavy pollution industry and private listed companies from 2009 to 2013 of the empirical analysis it is concluded that :(1)the effectiveness of "porter hypothesis"are different in different ow nership firms :exogenous environmental regulations of state‐ow ned en‐terprises has positive influence on technology innovation ,and has negative influence of private enterprises ,but the effect was not significant ;The endogenous environment regulations are very positive in promoting "Porter hypothesis"effective‐ness of state‐ow ned and private enterprises ,and stronger in state‐ow ned enterprises .(2) the executive incentive has adjust action in environmental regulation and technology innovation ,but only remarkable in private enterprises .Executive incen‐tive is larger ,the"Crowding Out"of environmental regulation on technical innovation is the smaller or "Innovation Effect"is bigger .But in the state‐owned enterprise samples ,we did not find the relevant evidence .