Abstract:Abstract Artificial intelligence in higher education is becoming more prevalent as it promises improvements and acceleration of administrative processes concerning student support, aiming for increasing student success and graduation rates. For instance, Academic Performance Prediction (APP) provides individual feedback and serves as the foundation for distributing student support measures. However, the use of APP with all its challenges (e.g., inherent biases) significantly impacts the future prospects of young adults. Therefore, it is important to weigh the opportunities and risks of such systems carefully and involve affected students in the development phase. This study addresses students’ fairness perceptions of the distribution of support measures based on an APP system. First, we examine how students evaluate three different distributive justice norms, namely, equality , equity , and need . Second, we investigate whether fairness perceptions differ between APP based on human or algorithmic decision-making, and third, we address whether evaluations differ between students studying science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) or social sciences, humanities, and the arts for people and the economy (SHAPE), respectively. To this end, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with a 2 $$\times$$ × 3 factorial design among n = 1378 German students, in which we utilized the distinct distribution norms and decision-making agents as design factors. Our findings suggest that students prefer an equality-based distribution of support measures, and this preference is not influenced by whether APP is based on human or algorithmic decision-making. Moreover, the field of study does not influence the fairness perception, except that students of STEM subjects evaluate a distribution based on the need norm as more fair than students of SHAPE subjects. Based on these findings, higher education institutions should prioritize student-centric decisions when considering APP, weigh the actual need against potential risks, and establish continuous feedback through ongoing consultation with all stakeholders.

Discussion and analysis of the factors affecting the fairness of graduate enrollment

The Management Systems and Operation Mechanisms of Academic Program in the U.S.Higher Education Systems

The Combination of Fairness and Science in the Reform of College Entrance Examination

The Reform of College Entrance Examination： Priority to Fairness or Efficiency

About the selection of graduate student enrollment source and system reform

Pursuit of Fairness:Perhaps It is the Root Cause of University Entrance Examination to Make Mistakes

Status Quo Of,problems In,and Way to Improve Doctoral Student Application,Examination and Admission System:Based on the Textual Analysis of the Doctoral Student Enrollment Guides from Six"9 8 5"Higher-Learning Institutions in 2 0 1 7

The Influence of College Entrance Examination Policy on Educational Equity in China

Analysis on the Preference Error Recognition in the Process of Signing up Postgraduate Entrance Examination——Based on the View of Public Department Theory

On Reform of Graduate Education on the Base of the First-Level Discipline

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

The status quo of academic ethics and norms in graduate students

Grading by AI makes me feel fairer? How different evaluators affect college students' perception of fairness

An Empirical Study of Independent Admission Policy of Higher Education Institution:Based on the perspectives of fairness and efficiency

Social Discrimination and College Enrollment: Findings from the China Family Panel Studies

Strategy of Resource Allocation for China's Graduate Education

Fairness of Academic Performance Prediction for the Distribution of Support Measures for Students: Differences in Perceived Fairness of Distributive Justice Norms

Bridging the Gap: Enhancing Employment Opportunities for Normal University Graduates in China's Knowledge Economy

Allocate Loans for Postgraduate Student in Professional Degree:Experience from the US and Implications for China

On the Fairness of China's Public Servant Examination and Recruitment System

Investigation and Research into the Status Quo of China's Postgraduate Education Quality