Abstract:South African Journal of Psychology, Ahead of Print. Time-based prospective memory involves tasks that must be executed at a specific time in the future. Individuals can complete time-based prospective memory tasks using internal attention and external attention. Field-independent and field-dependent cognitive styles are two of the most well-known cognitive styles. Field-independent individuals and field-dependent individuals prefer to use internal reference and external reference to process information, respectively, which implies that there may be differences in the processing mechanisms of the two cognitive styles when performing time-based prospective memory tasks. This study focused on differences in time-based prospective memory performance and processing mechanisms between field-independent and field-dependent cognitive style individuals under different time monitoring conditions. A total of 119 participants were recruited through an Embedded Figure Test and divided into four groups. Time monitoring conditions consisted of a free monitoring condition and a restricted monitoring condition. Participants in the restricted monitoring condition could only press the space bar once, whereas those in the free monitoring condition could check the time at any time and without restrictions. The results of the study showed that field-independent individuals expend less internal and external attention than field-dependent individuals. However, field-independent individuals have higher attention effectiveness and employ more strategies for processing time information. Field-independent individuals were also found to have better time-based prospective memory performance under both time monitoring conditions. Field-dependent individuals did check the time more often under the free monitoring condition, but their time-based prospective memory performance did not benefit from more external attention because although they expended more external attention, they did so less effectively. In short, compared with field-dependent individuals, field-independent individuals had better time-based prospective memory performance under both time monitoring conditions because they have higher attention effectiveness and adopt more strategies for the processing of time information.

Influence of Two Types of Attention on the Prospective Memory Task

Dual-task Costs in Memory Recall Precision Reflect Shared Representational Space

The Effect of Working Memory Load on Attentional Capture

The Influence of Task Importance on Transfer-appropriate Processing Effect in Prospective Memory

A Research on Prospective Memory Under Background Conditions of Different Degrees of Difficulty

The Rehearsal Effect Of Object-Based Attention On Object Working Memory

Effect of Attention and Working Memory Extract on Change Blindness

Effect of cognitive style on time-based prospective memory

Influences of Ongoing task's Resource Demands on the TAP Effect in Prospective Memory

THE INFLUENCE OF THE DEGREE OF RELATEDNESS BETWEEN THE TARGET CUE AND INTENTION ON PROSPECTIVE MEMORY

The Postdictive Effect of Choice Reflects the Modulation of Attention on Choice

Working-Memory-Guided Attention Competes with Exogenous Attention but Not with Endogenous Attention.

Using EEG to Investigate the Influence of Boredom on Prospective Memory in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processing Mechanisms for Intelligent Interaction.

The interaction of top-down and bottom-up attention in visual working memory

The Attentional Blink Between Two Color Processing Tasks

The Influence of Working Memory Load of Binding on Selective Attention

Differences in time-based prospective memory between field-independent and field-dependent cognitive styles under different time monitoring conditions

The Effects of Divided Attention and Selective Attention on the Accuracy of Memory

The effect of cognitive load and time stress on prospective memory and its components

The effects of cognitive load and encoding modality on prospective memory

The effect of target detection on memory retrieval