Abstract:In this essay I propose two different but complementary models with which to think about the relation between the novel and the historical process of globalization. The first—the globalization of the novel—works not with particular textual formations, but with the historical expansion of the novel form hand-in-hand with the colonial enterprise of Western Europe. With this interpretative concept, I review the historical and theoretical parameters that have been used to study both the historical spread of the novel from Europe to the peripheries and the constitution, at the end of the nineteenth and throughout the twentieth century, of a global system of production, reception, and translation of novels. The second model—the novelization of the global—focuses on the production of images of a globalized world as they are constructed in specific novels. My examples are novels by Jules Verne and Eduardo Ladislao Holmberg. While both writers create images of travelers spreading modern bourgeois culture throughout the world and beyond, as might be expected, Verne's images differ significantly from Holmberg's. My claim here is that the particular geopolitical determinations that marked each of these writers produced dissimilar imaginaries of the global reach of their bourgeois characters and plots. Finally, in a coda to this double hypothesis, I connect the interpretative models of the globalization of the novel and the novelization of the global with the rentrée of the concept of world literature. Recently re-introduced to academic debate by Franco Moretti, Pascale Casanova, and David Damrosch, among others, this restored notion of world literature can be understood as an attempt to conceptualize the global ubiquity of the novel since the mid-twentieth century. Here I analyze what could be called the cultural politics of world literature and the critical and pedagogical practices that are derived from this concept. I also examine its underlying claim to address, in academic practices, cosmopolitan expectations related to the production of a discourse about the world based on respect for cultural difference. In other words, my question is whether world literature, as a concept and as a practice, is capable of becoming an effective cosmopolitan discourse.

Engaging in the Dynamics of Cosmopolitan Reading:A Review of Cosmopolitanism and the Literary Imagination

Cosmopolitanism and Its Significance to Contemporary China

American literature in Chinese perspectives

We Are Citizens of the World: A Defence of the American Literature Survey (in the Name of Cosmopolitanism)

Approaching Orientalism in British and American Travel Literature

The Globalization of the Novel and the Novelization of the Global. A Critique of World Literature

Exploring Universality and Specificity in Poetry Translation: A Review of Translating Classical Chinese Poetry into World Literature: Burton Watson’s Translation as a Case

Reading Rancière: Literature at the Limit of World Literature

Globalizing Chinese literature: toward a rewriting of contemporary Chinese literary culture

Revisiting the Influence of Online Readers in Postcolonial Literature: A Postcolonial Analysis

Reading for the Planet

Visuality, mobility and the cosmopolitan: inhabiting the world from afar

A transcultural approach: mapping cosmopolitanism in Zadie Smith’s White Teeth (2000)

Book review: Crossing borders, writing texts, being evaluated: cultural and disciplinary norms in academic writing by Anne Golden, Lars Anders Kulbrandstad and Lawrence Zhang

The Multiple Dimensions of Space: Spatial Narrative Types and Socio-Cultural Mapping in New Century Chinese Novels

The Significance of Cosmopolitism in Contemporary Times

Seeds of Change and Emancipation: Towards a Cognitive Mapping of Globilisation in Literature

Reflection of the Japanese Consciousness and Worldview in the Context of Globalization in the Novels of Haruki Murakami

Angloglobalism, multilingualism and world literature

Hopes for Reading in the Era of Globalization

The Reconstruction of Literary Canon and the Future of Comparative Literature:An Interview with David Damrosch