Abstract:In the early years of the New Period, along with the constant improvement of the social and political environment, the contestations among the exponents in the academic circles became lively; the viewpoint that (″literature) is a special ideology″ was also hotly debated. In the beginning of 1988, Luan Changda and Dong Xuewen began to query about the essentiality of ideology, and brought a severe concussion to the concept of essentiality of literary ideology which was considered as the standard till that time, that triggered the contestation concerning the relationship between ideology and literature among the academic circles, which lasted for several years. The question whether the literature's true nature consists in ideology became the core proposition of the contestation. The essentiality of ideology recovered its predominant position in the contestation, and the scholars had sufficient and fruitful discussions on the definition of the basic concept of the ideology, the relationship between the literature and ideology, the dialectical relationship between the essentiality of literary ideology and the non-literary ideology, and the aesthetical ideology of literature etc. The fundamental premise of the deep probing into in the literary ideology is to understand correctly the original idea of the classic writers of Marxism and to clarify the ideology and its related concepts. As Lu Meilin said that too narrow or too broad interpretation of the connotation of the ideology is one of the main reasons that caused the disorder in the field of literature theories, and he pointed out that ideology is a concept about the whole organism of composing factors. Many scholars, such as Zhang Shouying, Bian Pingshu, and Li Sixiao, are interested in the composing factors of ideology. While they focused on the analysis of the concept of ideology, scholars like Feng Yi and Huang Lizhi adhered to the essentiality of ideology and launched the in-depth discussion on the relationship between the main role of literature and the nature of ideology. In the 1980s, scholars including Qian Zhongwen, Tong Qingbing and Wang Yuanxiang, deliberated on the aesthetical ideology and the aesthetical theory of reflection. In the field of the aesthetical ideology, they made a systematic and in-depth investigation on the nature of literature, successfully resolved the conflict between the literary ideology and the aesthetical consciousness, and opened a new window for us to understand the correlative contradictions between the form and the contents, the emotion and the reason, expression and representation, humanity and the class nature. Although there is a limitation in its failure to explain efficiently how to achieve the harmony between aesthetical consciousness and the ideological factors of literature, the aesthetical ideology transcended the bondage of pure epistemology, and fitted a dialectical link between the literary ideology and the aesthetical factors, and in this way enriched and developed the Marxist viewpoint on the nature of literature. In conclusion, when we affirm that the innate nature of literature consists in the ideology, we must know that literature also contains some non-ideological factors, and in order to prevent the tendency of simplicity and philistinism in the field of literary studies and to cognize the scientific literary phenomena, it is very important to penetrate into these non-ideological factors.

On Artistic and Literary Work and Concepts of Art and Literature Run by Kuomintang in Taiwan, with Examples from Three Conferences on Art and Literature

"Contemporary Literature":Its Structure and Basis of Legality

Constructing Contemporary Chinese Literary and art Theory (Symposium II)

Literature and Art Should Not Be the Slaves of the Market (Excerpt from Chapter VI)

The Aesthetic Foundation of ContemporaryChinese Literature and Art Policy

Party Literature Work, Ideology, and the Central Party Literature Office of the Communist Party of China

Search for Meaning of Life and Construction of Literature and Arts Curricula:A Brief Analysis of Lu Shu-yuan's Thoughts on Literature and Arts

Subject Constructions of Chinese Literature Criticism on the Turningpoint of the Century

From Literary Rules to Cultural Criticism- On Zhou Xian’s Literary and Academic Thoughts

A Comparative Study of Aristotle’s and Confucius’ Views on Literature

The Confucian Calligraphy Concept in Jiang Kui's “Xu Shu Pu”

A Critical Reflection on and Construction of Modern Chinese Literary Theory

An Analysis on 2007 Hot Spots in Study of Art and Literature

On Cultural Structure of China and the Artistic Spiritual Outlook

On Outline of the History of New Chinese Literature(Vol.2)

Perspective on the Study of Essentiality of Literary Ideology

Conspiracy Reversal-A Discussion on Karatani's "Japanese Literature" and Mizoguchi Yuzo's "Chinese Thought"

Study on Cai Yuanpei's Ideology——Explore the Public Nature of Chinese Fine Arts Ideology in Early 20~(th)

On the status of literary criticism and literary innovation in China

Lu Xun and Modern Times Reformism Literature

The Dilemmas and Main Issues in the Research of the Historical Documents of Contemporary Chinese Literature