Study on Biomass and Carbon Storage of Different Community Types of Pinus Massoniana

CHEN Mo-fang,DING Gui-jie,ZHAI Shuai-shuai,GAO Xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2016.07.014
2016-01-01
Abstract:A(artificial pure forest of Pinus massoniana), B(natural secondary pure forest of Pinus massoniana), C(mixed forest of Pinus massoniana and Camellia oleifera), D(mixed forest of Pinus massoniana and Liquidambar formosana), E(mixed forest of Pinus massoniana and Quercus fabri) and F(mixed forest of Pinus massoniana and Cunninghamia lanceolata) were studyed based on the biomass data collected from ifeld surveys and the carbon contents of each tree organ with potassium dichromate method. The results showed that the aboveground biomass in different communities ranked in the decreasing order of F(153.293 t·hm-2), E(67.482 t·hm-2), D(58.581 t ·hm-2), B(51.995 t ·hm-2), C(35.405 t ·hm-2), A (33.387 t ·hm-2). The biomass of arbor layer in different community types was the largest, with the value from 25.986 to 146.015 t/hm2, the next was shrub layer while the herb layer was the minimum. Besides, the carbon storages of the 6 community types were from 18.312 to 70.549 t·hm-2.The order of average annual average carbon sequestration was community F>community E>community D>community C>community A>community B.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?