A Comparative Analysis of Environmental Quality Assessment Methods for Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils
Weixin Li,Xuxiang Zhang,Bing Wu,Shi-Lei Sun,Yansong Chen,Wen-Yang Pan,Dayong Zhao,Shengfeng Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(08)60024-7
IF: 5.514
2008-01-01
Pedosphere
Abstract:Four assessment methods (two pollution indexes and two fuzzy mathematical models) were employed to investigate the environmental quality of four soils around a ferroalloy plant in Nanjing City. Environmental quality was assessed as class IV (moderately polluted) for each soil with single-factor index method, and was identifled to be classes IV, III (slightly polluted), III, and III for soils A, B, C, and D, respectively, with the comprehensive index model. In comparison with the single-factor index method, the comprehensive index model concerned both dominant parameter and average contribution of all factors to the integrated environmental quality. Using the two fuzzy mathematical methods (single-factor deciding and weighted average models), the environmental risks were determined to be classes IV, III, II (clean), and II for soils A, B, C, and D, respectively. However, divergence of the membership degree to each pollution class still occurred between the two methods. In fuzzy mathematical methods, membership functions were used to describe the limits between difierent pollution degrees, and difierent weights were allocated for the factors according to pollution contribution. Introduction of membership degree and weight of each factor to fuzzy mathematical models made the methods more reasonable in the fleld of environmental risk assessment.