Livelihood transformation of farmers and herdsmen in the agro-pastoral ecotone from the perspective of ecological protection: a case study of the Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County, China
Jieyu Yang,Qiangqiang Chen,Xiujuan Cui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04973-z
IF: 4.08
2024-05-11
Environment Development and Sustainability
Abstract:The livelihood transformation for farmers and herdsmen based on the perspective of ecological protection is an important means of achieving green sustainable livelihood-ecological development. Based on survey data from 309 farmer and herdsmen households in the agro-pastoral ecotone of Tianzhu County, a coupled coordination model was used to measure the degree of coordination between livelihoods and ecology, and a multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyse the influencing factors of the transformation of different livelihood strategies of farmers and herdsmen. (1) The coupling coordination degree the four types of livelihoods with the ecology for the pure pastoral, semi-agricultural types, agricultural-industrial types and nonagricultural types and that with semipastoral farmers and herdsmen are 0.3776, 0.3611, 0.3992 and 0.5378, respectively, which belonged to the categories of mildly dysfunctional, mildly dysfunctional, verging on dissonance and barely coordinated, respectively. (2) Natural and physical capital have an inhibiting effect on the transition from purely pastoral, semiagricultural and semipastoral farmers and herdsmen into the agro-industrial or nonagricultural, with impact coefficients of − 5.604, − 6.742, − 8.784, − 9.389 respectively; Human and social capital contribute to the transition from purely pastoral, semiagricultural and semipastoral farmers and herdsmen into the agro-industrial, with impact coefficients of 5.244, 3.100, 4.260 and 3.735, respectively. (3) Grassland area per capita, the source of family income, the number of family labourers and their health condition positively promote the transition from pure pastoral, semiagricultural and semipastoral types to agro-industrialism and non-farming; livestock numbers and financial assistance hinder the transition from the pure pastoral, semiagricultural and semipastoral types to nonagricultural type. The livelihoods of farmers and herdsmen are highly dependent on local resources and the environment. livelihood transformation is imperative. The factors that affect the transformation of farmers' and herdsmen' livelihoods are different, thus differentiated livelihood transformation strategies should be developed.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology