Measurement of Atmospheric Hydrogen Peroxide and Organic Peroxides in Beijing Before and During the 2008 Olympic Games: Chemical and Physical Factors Influencing Their Concentrations
S. Z. He,Z. M. Chen,X. Zhang,Y. Zhao,D. M. Huang,J. N. Zhao,T. Zhu,M. Hu,L. M. Zeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013544
2010-01-01
Journal of Geophysical Research
Abstract:For the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games full‐scale control (FSC) of atmospheric pollution was implemented to improve the air quality from 20 July to 20 September 2008, resulting in a significant decrease in the emission of pollutants in urban Beijing, especially vehicular emissions. The combination of reduced emissions and weather condition changes provided us with a unique opportunity to investigate urban atmospheric chemistry. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and organic peroxides play significant roles in atmospheric processes, such as the cycling of HOx radicals and the formation of secondary sulfate aerosols and secondary organic aerosols. We measured atmospheric H2O2 and organic peroxides in urban Beijing, at the Peking University campus, from 12 July to 30 September, before and during the FSC. The major peroxides observed were H2O2, methyl hydroperoxide (MHP), and peroxyacetic acid (PAA), having maximal mixing ratios of 2.34, 0.95, and 0.17 ppbv (parts per billion by volume), respectively. Other organic peroxides were detected occasionally, such as bis‐hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide, hydroxymethyl hydroperoxide, ethyl hydroperoxide, and 1‐hydroxyethyl hydroperoxide. On sunny days the concentrations of H2O2, MHP, and PAA exhibited pronounced diurnal variations, with a peak in the afternoon (1500–1900) and, occasionally, a second peak in the evening (2000–0200). The night peaks can be attributed to local night production from the ozonolysis of alkenes, coupled with the reaction between NO3 radicals and organic compounds. Sunny‐day weather dominated during 16–26 July, and we found that the concentrations of H2O2, MHP, and PAA increased strikingly on 22–26 July, compared with the concentrations during 16–19 July. This effect was mainly attributed to the NOx (NO and NO2) decline because of the FSC, due to (i) the suppressing effect of NO and NO2 on the production of peroxides and (ii) the indirect effect of reduced NOx on the concentration of peroxides via O3 production in the volatile organic compound‐sensitive area. Although the time period from 29 July to 15 August fell within the FSC, the concentrations of H2O2, MHP, and PAA decreased significantly. This can be explained by a combination of chemical and physical factors during this period, when rainy‐ and cloudy‐day weather dominated. Weaker irradiation and lower temperatures resulted in a lower photochemical production of peroxides; the higher humidity resulted in their greater loss through their aqueous‐phase oxidation of S(IV) and through heterogeneous removal, and lower temperatures and higher nighttime humidity resulted in a quicker surface deposition of peroxides. Furthermore, our observations seem to imply that the heterogeneous removal of H2O2 is faster than that of MHP, as indicated by the strong negative correlation between the H2O2‐to‐MHP ratio and the aerosol surface area.