The role of heart rate in the left ventricular twist response to increased arterial blood pressure: a ‘stiff’ challenge?
E. Stöhr
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/EP085575
2016-02-01
Experimental Physiology
Abstract:With every heartbeat, the left ventricle (LV) has to overcome the blood pressure in the aorta to eject the stroke volume. The presence of a chronically elevated arterial blood pressure, termed ‘hypertension’, is associated with impaired LV function, adverse LV remodelling and a poor outcome. As a consequence, the interaction between the LV and arterial blood pressure has received much attention. Classic experiments have shown that a raised arterial blood pressure reduces the output of the heart (Markwalder & Starling, 1914). In recent decades, novel parameters of LV function pertaining to the chamber’s muscle deformation have emerged that may advance the previous knowledge. These parameters include ‘strain’, which is reflective of the percentage of LV muscle deformation from the end-diastolic to the end-systolic state. Additionally, it has been recognized that cardiac contraction is accompanied by a twisting motion around the LV long axis. Elegant anatomical descriptions of the LV structure have revealed helical and circumferential myofibres that interact with a laminar arrangement and cleavage planes to result in the overall twisting motion (Greenbaum et al. 1981; LeGrice et al. 1995). Given that cardiac twist occurs only in the LV, differences between pulmonary artery systolic blood pressure ( 20–25 mmHg) and aortic pressure ( 110–130 mmHg) may be responsible for the unique LV muscle deformation. Accordingly, the measurement of LV twist has been incorporated into the study of experimental conditions that alter arterial blood pressure. In a recent issue of Experimental Physiology, Balmain et al. (2016) report data from an experiment that examined the effects of isometric hand grip (IHG) followed by arterial occlusion on LV twist mechanics. This experimental design, using the exercise pressor reflex to elevate blood pressure during postexercise circulatory occlusion, whilst allowing heart rate to fall to resting levels on cessation of exercise, enabled the authors to tease out the in vivo contribution of heart rate to the LV twist response during raised blood pressure. This revealed that the previously reported reduction in LV twist seen during IHG (Weiner et al. 2012) is exacerbated when the typical rise in heart rate during IHG is removed by postexercise circulatory occlusion. Consequently, Balmain et al. (2016) propose that ‘sympathovagal balance’ may play an important role in the LV twist response to increased arterial blood pressure. Consistent with previous studies, the authors also report that the reduced LV twist during both IHG and subsequent arterial occlusion was underpinned by a regional decline in apical rotation, whereas basal rotation was not significantly altered. The growing evidence that the LV apex appears to be sensitive to changes in arterial blood pressure is intriguing because it is located further away from the aortic valve than the LV base. Could it be that the LV apex may have a different sympathetic innervation from the rest of the LV and is indeed contracting ‘automatically’ (Bowditch, 1878), thus being affected more by conditions that alter the sympathovagal balance, as proposed by Balmain et al. (2016)? Whatever the underlying mechanisms, the data presented by Balmain et al. (2016) raise the hypothesis that conditions with increased afterload may be associated with an isolated impact on the LV apex that could be influenced in part by alterations in autonomic nervous function. Future studies may aim to examine the effects of selective adrenergic stimulation of the LV apex to improve LV twist mechanics. Although sympathomimetics are typically avoided as a treatment strategy in conditions such as hypertension, the present data encourage further investigation of its more localized effects, which may provide new insight into the short-term versus long-term effects of increased arterial blood pressure and regional LV function and might possibly even prevent adverse LV remodelling. A few other observations made by Balmain et al. (2016) deserve brief discussion. For example, the authors found that LV longitudinal strain was unaltered across all experimental conditions. These data are in direct agreement with a study previously published in Experimental Physiology and suggest that LV twist may be a more sensitive marker than longitudinal strain in conditions with increased arterial blood pressure, mostly because LV longitudinal strain underestimates apical function (Stöhr et al. 2015). Considering that many clinical conditions are associated with a raised blood pressure, it may be important to measure LV twist mechanics instead of the currently popular longitudinal strain to determine the impact of primary or secondary hypertension on cardiac function. Another important finding by Balmain et al. (2016) pertains to the response of LV untwisting rate. In contrast to the progressive decline in LV twist throughout the experiment, LV untwisting rate was only decreased significantly during arterial occlusion. Importantly, according to the authors’ study design, the overall response did not appear to be associated with the change in heart rate. Given that LV untwisting rate has previously been associated with LV restoring forces (Opdahl et al. 2012), future studies may seek to examine the sympathovagal influence on apical untwisting and cardiac stiffness during episodes of increased arterial blood pressure. Likewise, the study by Balmain et al. (2016) should be extended by examining central and peripheral arterial stiffness and the interaction of parameters such as aortic pulse wave velocity with LV twist mechanics (Ben-Shlomo et al. 2014). In summary, the study by Balmain et al. (2016) provides new insight into the interaction between arterial blood pressure and LV twist mechanics by highlighting the influence of heart rate on regional LV mechanical responses. The data suggest that a reduced sympathovagal balance during an acute episode of increased arterial blood pressure may contribute to a greater reduction in LV twist mechanics. Future studies may examine whether regional LV sympathetic activation in hypertensive patients with reduced cardiac output may