ANPP estimate from MODIS-EVI for the grassland region of Xilingol, China

Zheng-xing WANG,Chuang LIU,Bing-ru ZHAO,Ai-jun LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0455-2059.2005.02.003
2005-01-01
Abstract:Above-ground Net Primary Productivity (ANPP) of grasses in Xilingol, Inner Mongolia, China, were correlated over May-September 2002 to Enhanced Vegetation Indices (EVI) derived from 250/500 m visible and near-infrared bands of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). This article discussed the potentials and limits of MODIS-EVI over MODIS-NDVI by 5 months, 4 grasslands and 2 kinds of models. Temporally, July was the optimal time to estimate ANPP from vegetation indices, with a R =0.548 3 for linear EVI-ANPP relation and a R2 =0.5436 for linear NDVI-ANPP relation; June and September were less suitable for establishing the VI-ANPP model. Month by month, all 5 EVI-ANPP models had higher R2 than correspond NDVI-ANPP models. Spatially, linear NDVI-ANPP models worked best for typical steppe and meadow steppe, with R2= 5056 and _R2=0.5647 respectively. By contrast, linear EVI-ANPP models worked best for meadow steppe and desert steppe, with R2= 6334 and _R2=0.5403. With regards to the different models, power-function models had a generally closer VI-ANPP relation than its linear counterparts, the overall R2 =0.5492 for power-function EVI-ANPP, better than R2 =0.5184 for linear EVI-ANPP model. To improve the models, only site data from May, July, and August were used to re-establish the models. The resulting models were improved impressively. R for linear EVI-ANPP increased from 0.5184 to 0.6250; R for power function EVI-ANPP increased from 0.5492 to 0.7324. More research is needed to investigate the inter-year stability of these models.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?