Abstract:This study investigates trade credit and early payment financing in a three-party supply chain consisting of a manufacturer, a capital-constrained distributor, and a retail platform. The manufacturer or the platform provides the financing service to the distributor. Two different leadership structures are investigated, namely, platform and manufacturer leadership Stackelberg game, where the platform or manufacturer first makes the decision, respectively. Under trade credit financing, the manufacturer and the whole supply chain face loss when the commission rate increases. However, under buyer financing, they benefit from the high commission rate. Under platform leadership, the distributor, the manufacturer, and the supply chain perform better with trade credit if and only if the commission rate is small or the production cost is high, while the platform always prefers buyer financing. Under manufacturer leadership, the distributor, manufacturer, and supply chain perform better with trade credit under low production cost and commission rate. The platform prefers trade credit when production cost is in the intermediate range. By further analyzing the case that both financing channels are available and the distributor decides which one to choose, we find that the financing services competition hurts only the platform’s profits. And under certain conditions, trade credit and early payment can achieve the same performance for every supply chain member. These findings enhance our understanding of the supply chain risk allocation efficiency of trade credit and early payment financing under different leadership structures. Neither risk allocation form outperforms the other, and the relative efficiency depends on supply chain characteristics.

On the Incentive Contract to Keep Trade Credit with Asymmetric Information in Supply Chain

Supply Chain Coordination under Asymmetric Risk Aversion Information

Trade credit contracting in a risk-averse supply chain under adverse selection and moral hazard

Trade Credit Contracts under Asymmetric Information

Incentive mechanism to prevent moral hazard in online supply chain finance

The value of trade credit contract in capital-constrained supply chains

Optimal government and manufacturer incentive contracts for green production with asymmetric information

Study on the Contract Design under the Obligation of Information Cost and Demand Information Sharing Incentive

Designing the trade credit contract with competitive retailers

Incentive Provision for Demand Information Acquisition in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain

Supplier-retailer contracting under asymmetric risk attitude information in supply chain

Revenue-sharing Trade Credit Contract for Coordinating Multiple Competing Retailers When Incorporating Default Risk

Trade Credit and Buyer Financing

Contracting with asymmetric cost information in a dual-channel supply chain.

Design of Supply Chain Linear Shared-Saving Contract with Asymmetric Information

Long-Term Incentive Contracts Designing on Heterogeneous Sales-agents

Trade Credit, Risk Sharing, and Inventory Financing Portfolios

Manufacturer-retailer contracting with asymmetric information on retailer's degree of loss aversion

Incentive contract design considering quotas production: A principal-agent perspective

Retailer-driven carbon emission reduction: contract design in the presence of information asymmetry and cap-and-trade

Trade Credit Contract With Limited Liability