Study on the characteristics of particle matters concentration distribution in the diatomaceous earth ore exploration area and environmental health risk assessment

Zhao-jun WANG,Lian-xi SHENG,Gang ZHANG,Yong WANG,Ting-ting XIAO,Sheng-yi MAO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16163/j.cnki.22-1123/n.2017.04.027
2017-01-01
Abstract:In this study,the typical diatomite mines and blank drying fields situated in the mountain area in Liudaogou Town,Baishan City was chosen in spring of 2016(March to May).Combining the on-the-spot monitoring with risk health evaluation methodology,the researchers indicated the concentration feature of PM 2.5 and PM 10 (working condition) in diatomite mines and blank drying fields.According to Ambient air standards of WHO,the AQI index of America and China,the researchers have made a health risk evaluation.The results are exhibited as follows:in static condition,the average concentration of PM 2.5 in mines is (30.2 ± 0.53) μg/m3;the average concentration of PM 10 is (152.47±0.46) μg/m3.The average concentration of PM 2.5 in blank fields is (32.4±0.32) μg/m3.The average concentration of PM 10 is (79.7 ± 0.69) μg/m3.In working condition,the average concentration of PM 2.5 and PM 10 in mines is respectively (197.4±32.5) μg/m3 and (3 055.4± 205.6) μμg/m3.The average concentration of PM 2.5 and PM 10 in blank fields is (139±44.6)μg/m3 and (2 195.4±135.2) μg/m3.In static condition,the exposure level of PM 2.5 and PM 10 in mines is respectively 30.2 μg/m3 and 152.5 μg/m3 and the same indicator in blank fields is 32.4 μg/m3 and 79.7 μg/m3.In working condition,the exposure level of PM 2.5 and PM 10 in mines is respectively 98.7 μg/m3 and 1 527.7 μg/m3 and the same indicator in blank fields is 69.5 μg/m3 and 1 097.7 μg/m3.In work situation (short-term exposure),the results of environmental health risk evaluation indicates that the concentration of PM 2.5 and PM 10 in mines and blank fields is far more than the standard IT-1 and the AQI index of PM 10 in mines and blank fields exceeds the upper limit,and the AQI index of PM 2.5 shows successively four levels:very unhealthy,unhealthy,heavily polluted and moderately polluted.In static condition (long-term exposure),the results of environmental health risk evaluation illustrate that the concentration of PM 2.5 in mines and blank fields realizes the standard IT-3 and the concentration of PM 10 in mines is lower than the standard IT-2,in blank fields higher than the standard IT-1 and the PM 2.5 and PM 10 AQI index in mines and blank fields is respectively the level 2 (moderate) and the level 3 (mildly polluted),level 2 (good).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?